2020, Vol. 27
As a class of semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer, poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) has attracted much attention due to the exceptional mechanical performances and thermal stability[1-3]. PEEK is a kind of homopolymers which could be synthesized via a stepwise polymerization method. Besides, the physical and chemical performances could be determined by chemical composition, molecular chains, and crystalline structures[4]. The regular molecular arrangements and chemical structures make it highly resistant to chemical and radiation damage[5]. In addition, the great biocompatibility and non-toxicity endow it with wide potential use to replace metal or ceramic counterparts in biomedical and aerospace applications[6]. In addition, PEEK possesses plenty of exceptional performances such as superior wear resistance, great processability, inertness, corrosion resistance, and so on[7].
PEEK possesses the elevated temperature steadiness above 300 ℃ and Young′s modulus of 3.6 GPa[8], which requires neither cross-linking nor preserving agents[9]. Moreover, PEEK is highly tunable through various monomers, functionalizing with amination, sulphonation, and nitration[8]. PEEK was first patented by the Imperial Chemical Industries for engineering applications in 1978[10], and then was commercialized for industrial manufacture applications. In 1998, it was utilized in biomedical area by Invibio Ltd. (UK)[11].
Excellent performances make PEEK material widely applicable in biomedical, machinery, energy storage, and aerospace fields. Besides, PEEK based composites has gained researchers' wide attention, due to the synergized incorporation of excellent performances of PEEK matrix and unique desirable properties of functional fillers. This review summarized the preparation of PEEK based materials, emphasizing on their various applications in biomedical, machinery, energy storage, and aerospace fields. Besides, the existed problems, modified methods, and development directions were put forward, aiming to provide effective ideas to develop the fabrications and universal applications of PEEK based materials.
2 Synthesis Approaches 2.1 Synthesis of Neat PEEKThe synthesis of neat PEEK was firstly reported by Colquhoun et al.[12] via electrophilic substitution reaction, which is also called as Friedel-Crafts acylation. They dissolved the 4-(4-phenoxy) phenoxy benzoic acid in the solvent of TFMSA, in the presence of a small quantity of 1, 4-di(4-carboxyl) phenoxy benzene or 1, 4-diphenoxybenzene as an end-capping agent, to successfully synthesize neat PEEK(Scheme 1).
|
Scheme 1 Synthesis pathway of PEEK in TFMSA[12] |
Neat PEEK was synthesized by using a difunctional aromatic compound dissolved in polar solvent, which was then derived to thiocarbonic acid (Scheme 2)[13].
|
Scheme 2 Synthesis of PEEK in polar solvent[13] |
At present, common PEEK is synthesized via a nucleophilic substitution route[13]. 4, 4′- difluorobenzophenone and hydroquinone are chosen as reacted monomers. Diphenyl sulfone acts as solvent, and alkali metal carbonate is employed as catalyst system(Scheme 3).
|
Scheme 3 Synthesis pathway of common PEEK via nucleophilic substitution route |
2.2 Synthesis of Modified PEEK
Functional groups have been commonly introduced into the neat monomers, or other functional monomers are chosen to synthesize the modified PEEK. Wei et al.[14] fabricated a new type of PEEK through the post functionalization of carboxyl groups decorated PEEK (PEEK-COOH)(Scheme 4).
|
Scheme 4 Synthesis pathway of PEEK-SO2 through post functionalization of the corresponding PEEK-COOH[14] |
Karthikeyan et al.[15] obtained PEEK containing propargyl groups through the post reaction of hydroxyl terminated PEEK. The integration of propargyl groups effectively increased the thermal stability, mechanical performance, and fracture toughness for high-performance engineering applications. Fluorene-based PEEKs (F-PEEK) could be normally synthesized using a 9, 9-diarylfluorene-containing biphenol and a naphthalene-containing dihaloarene[16], through a two-step polycondensation of 9, 9-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methylphenyl)fluorene (DFA) and 1, 5-bis(4-fluorobenzoyl)-2, 6-dimethylnaphthalene (BHF) with cesium carbonate for accelerating reactions. The synthesis pathway is shown in Scheme 5.
|
Scheme 5 Synthesis pathway of F-PEEK[16] |
3 Performances of PEEK Material
As a kind of widely used material, PEEK possesses plenty of indispensable advantages, such as excellent mechanical properties, dimensional stability, thermal stability, chemical stability, biocompatibility, etc. The regular molecular chains ensure the desired strength and stability, and the intrinsic thermal plastic endows it with great processing and reprocessing capacity, promoting the feasibility in widespread applications[17-18].
The preparation of PEEK material has attracted researchers' wide attention due to the excellent performances. The exceptional processability endows PEEK material with various applied patterns, such as membrane[19], nanofibers[20], aerogel[21], microfiller[22], matrix materials[23-24], and 3D printing component[25]. Every applied pattern owns its unique merits and could be used in various application fields. The affluent benzene rings on main chains and regular molecular arrangements give it the excellent mechanical properties and thermal stability, which could replace traditional metal or ceramic counterparts. The great chemical resistance is attributed to that there are not active reactive functional groups on PEEK chains. Meanwhile, it has great corrosion and irradiation resistance. In addition, PEEK material has been employed widely in biomedical applications due to the great biocompatibility and non-toxicity.
4 Applications of PEEK MaterialPEEK materials have been used in various applied patterns and application fields. Electrospun nano/micro-fibers have attracted researches' wide attention, because of the extremely high specific surface area and porosity, which are used widely in various fields[26]. As a kind of engineering plastics, PEEK matrix composite materials have been widely used in engineering and aerospace applications[24]. Sulfonated PEEK (SPEEK) electrospun nanofibers[20], and un-sulfonated PEEK microfibers[27] which exhibited homogeneous and defect-free morphology, extend the applications of PEEK in the field of energy storage. 3D printing with PEEK materials allow widespread utility of the materials for practical applications[28-31]. Wang et al.[30] used fused deposition modeling (FDM) method to achieve 3D printing of PEEK. Obtaining designed structure of PEEK material leads to a wide application prospect. Not only inherent merits, such as excellent mechanical property, thermal stability, chemical resistance, and biocompatibility, but also feasible various processing technologies and precise structures endow PEEK material with wide potential usage in lots of fields such as biomedical implants, machinery engineering, energy storage, and aerospace applications.
4.1 Biomedical ApplicationsOwing to the high mechanical strength, good chemical resistance, and biocompatibility, PEEK has been employed as a promising material in biomedical engineering[32-34], which could be widely used in orthopedic, trauma, and dental fields[35-37]. The processing pattern of PEEK used for biomedical applications has been developed widely, such as molding pressing, injection mold[38], 3D printing[39-41], and so on. Molding pressing and injection mold make it possible to prepare PEEK material with controllable mechanical performances[42]. 3D printing system could help researchers obtain urgently needed structures, which are conducive to the allowance of the initiation of cell attachment and osseintegration, and consequently contribute to tissue growth[43].
Due to the suitable mechanical performances, PEEK has been widely used in orthopedic and dental fields, as the elastic modulus (3-4 GPa) is close to the human bone[29], conducive to the homogeneous stress distribution from surrounding tissues. The matching of elastic modulus can avoid the phenomenon of bone resorption, which happens owing to stress shielding between metal implants and bones[44]. Besides, PEEK enables the adhesion of human osteoblasts and fibroblasts under inflammatory environmental conditions[45-46]. In addition, radiographic radiolucency and low density (1.32 g/cm3) make it suitable for biomedical implants[47].
4.1.1 Bioactivity modificationThe inherent bioinertness hampers the application of PEEK in bone repair/substitution, due to the poor osteogenesis capability. Thus, improving the bioactivity of PEEK is a major challenge that must be solved to fully realize the potential benefits. Meanwhile, PEEK, because of the inherent bioinertness, has sometimes been considered to be a bioinert material, since it does not cause any adverse reaction to the human tissues[48]. Improving the bioactivity of PEEK materials without compromising the mechanical properties is a major challenge, which can be solved by two main strategies, surface modification and composite preparation[49-50]. Appropriate surface modification could effectively modify the osseointegration of PEEK implants[51]. Fabrication of composites can enable researchers to obtain variable combinations of mechanical properties required for any particular application[52-54]. Functional biofillers have been incorporated into PEEK matrix to endow it with the desired performances[53].
·Surface modification
The adhesion and integration of biomaterials is highly important for the tissue regarding the improving of surface performances, including hydrophilicity and roughness[54-55]. Besides, the cell differentiation and substrate osseointegration could be effectively controlled by the surface texture of PEEK material[56]. Surface modification of PEEK could effectively improve the bioactivity, and concurrently maintain the most advantageous properties. The concrete modification methods mainly include physical treatment modification, coating modification, and chemical modification.
Laser[57], gaseous plasma[58], and irradiation methods[59-60] could be used to modify the surface morphology of PEEK and improve the bioactivity. Omrani et al.[57] performed laser treatment for surface modification of PEEK, to gain the appropriate roughness and wettability, both of which are essential for cell adhesion, which is used in bone implant. Plasma surface treatment and Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam could be reliable alternative methods to improve the surface activity of PEEK material[58-60].
Surface properties of PEEK could be improved through the coating of growth factors and bioactive nanoparticles[61-62]. Wan et al.[56] immobilized the dual growth factors (insulin-like growth factor-1 and bone morphogenetic proteins-2) onto PEEK surface, and used polydopamine to obtain a bioactive coating. Besides, the aggregation of bioactive Ti-Mg alloy thin film onto PEEK material could effectively enhance the adhesion strength[63].
Some bioactive groups could be introduced into PEEK matrix via the corresponding chemical reaction[64-65] to modify the bioactivity of PEEK material. Masamoto et al.[66] treated PEEK with "precursor of apatite" (PrA), and achieved the stronger and faster adhesion to bone, which endows it with great bone-bonding properties. Besides, the combination of sulfonation and alkali treatment could largely improve the apatite deposition and bioactivity of PEEK rapidly[67]. In addition, the integration of tripeptide Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) onto the PDA-coated surface of PEEK was developed to produce a bioactive and biocompatible PEEK for osteodifferentiation[68], as shown in Fig. 1.
|
Fig.1 Schematic diagram of the fabrication of a functional PEEK surface[68] (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [68]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society) |
·Compositing with bioactive materials
Compared with the pure material, the mechanical performances of composites could be improved via the integration of low-cost enhanced material[69]. Thus, biomedical PEEK composites could achieve the tailored properties[70]. The bioactivity of PEEK could be improved through the incorporation of PEEK with other materials, such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)[71], organic silicone[72], AgNPs[73], and graphene oxide (GO)[74].
4.1.2 Orthopedic applicationsPEEK has many positive qualities, such as bioinertness, biocompatibility, suitable strength, and elastic properties[75-76]. Nevertheless, lack of bioactivity and biointegration might result in the failure of the graft implants and reconstructive procedure[77].
There are three main methods to improve osseointegration and bone apposition of PEEK material.
·Incorporating bioactive materials into PEEK
Tantalum, due to the excellent malleability and chemical resistance, could be introduced into PEEK matrix to modify the performances[78-79]. Besides, calcium silicate (CaS) was incorporated into PEEK matrix to endow the bioactive cage with fusion ability and stable mechanical performances[80-81].
·Coating biomaterials onto PEEK implants
Xu et al.[82] loaded the Dex/Mino liposome onto PEEK surface, gaining the improved bioactivity, which presented favorable stability and cytocompatibility. He et al.[83] constructed a chlorogenic acid/grafted peptide hydrogel system, as supported by PEEK material, which exhibited excellent bioaffinity and antibacatetial activity.
·Introducing porosity into PEEK implants
Highly micro-porous surface structure could promote the bioactivity of PEEK material[84]. A novel approach which filled a threaded PEEK hollow chamber with holes with CaS/hydroxyapatite (HA) composites and loaded active molecules, improving bone anchorage and reduced prosthetic failure[85]. Ye et al.[86] proposed a delicate cicada and catkin inspired biomimetic smart structure, using PEEK as a model implant(Fig. 2). The obtained PEEK biomimetic sample could inhibit bacterial adhesion from providing wide antimicrobial range and long antibacterial performance.
|
Fig.2 Schematic diagram and SEM images of the nanopillars array on PEEK[86] (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [86]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry) |
In addition, to meet the enhanced strength and biocompatibility of orthopaedic implants, bioactive enhanced fillers have been integrated into PEEK matrix to fabricate the exceptional mechanical performance composites. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)[87], bioactive glass (BG)[87], and carbon fiber (CF)[88] are commonly used as the reinforced fillers for PEEK matrix. Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK (CF-PEEK) is expected to replace metal implants in orthopaedic surgery[89]. The radiolucency of CF-PEEK endows it with visualization of bone and tissue components[90-91], which could be implemented by 3D printing technology[92-94].
4.1.3 Dental prosthesisPEEK has become a candidate for dental prosthesis[95-96]. Due to the low density and good polishability, PEEK material has been employed as a promising substitute for the fabrication of dental implant abutments[97]. Incorporating biocompatible inorganic fillers into PEEK-based composites could be used in dental implants[82].
4.2 Machinery EngineeringPEEK show high performance in applications involving relative motion. Its good chemical resistance, aging resistance, high strength, and high wear resistance make it an ideal material for machinery engineering components[98-99]. Therefore, PEEK has been used as the substitutes of such parts as transmission gears, seal rings, sliders, bushings, and bearings[100-102].
In the machinery applications, PEEK material is often rubbed against other counterface. Thus, the PEEK-metal interface is crucial in determining the tribological properties of PEEK-metal tribopairs, including contact temperature, friction coefficient, and wear resistance[103-105]. Besides, different friction responses of PEEK material are related to the variation manner of temperature[106-108]. To modify the tribological performance, surface modification might be effective. Besides, inorganic particles are incorporated into PEEK matrix to improve the abrasion resistance[109].
4.2.1 Surface modificationThe tribological properties of metal interfaces have been commonly improved via the deposition of PEEK coating. For example, Ti-6Al-4V alloy substrate was coated with PEEK to develop a better surface topography, which showed a lower friction coefficient as well as higher wear resistance[110]. In addition, the surface topography of PEEK could be modified through the Friedel-Crafts reaction and successive epoxidation to obtain high adhesion strength[111].
4.2.2 Enhancement of PEEK with inorganic particlesThe incorporation of inorganic particles into PEEK matrix could effectively improve the tribological performances[112]. Cenosphere fillers have been incorporated into carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites to enhance the wear resistance under different load conditions[113]. Bartolomeu et al.[114] gathered Ti6Al4V and PEEK properties in a cellular structured component, which is conducive to a good compromise between the primary stability and wear performance.
4.2.3 PEEK-CF composites with tribological coatingsIn machinery engineering, it is important to ensure the mechanical properties of load-bearing component, overlapping joints, and contacted interface[115]. Thus, PEEK-based enhanced composites have been developed for machinery applications which desire excellent mechanical and tribological properties[116]. Hassan et al.[117] built a lubricating PEEK-CF composites by coating polyetherimide (PEI) and COOH-functionalized MWCNTs. The miscibility was improved through the hydrogen bonding and π - π interaction among components, significantly enhancing the mechanical performances.
4.3 Energy StoragePEEK, due to the great chemical resistance and mechanical properties, has been employed in energy storage, especially as batteries separators. It is essential for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) that separators possess superior mechanical properties, thermal stability, and electrolyte wettability[118-125]. Li et al.[126] synthesized F-PEEK polymers as well as fabricated the porous LIBs separators via an electrospinning method, which improved the safety and electrochemical properties. Li et al.[127] exploited hydroxymethyl functionalized PEEK (HOPEEK) as the separator of LIBs. Solid HOPEEK backbone endowed it with high thermal stability and high conductivity. Li et al.[121] reported a sponge-like porous PEEK membrane, which exhibited high thermal stability and mechanical performances.
4.4 Aerospace ApplicationIt is important for aerospace materials to be application specific, lightweighted, and stable[128]. PEEK has a promising application prospect with its low density, high glass transition temperature, and stability under ultra-high vacuum condition[129-130]. The applications of PEEK material in aerospace fields are universal, such as aviation parts, connector, fastener, high temperature insulation ring, insulation heat sink, etc. It is noteworthy that PEEK's stability under conditions close to real processing[131] and suitability under space environment conditions[132] are really significant for space applications.
To meet the harsh condition in space environment, PEEK based enhanced composites have been developed widely, which could be more viable candidates for aerospace applications[133]. PEEK composites exhibit a viable composition of creep resistance and ductility, which is attractive to manufacturers and engineers[134-135]. Upon the addition of reinforced fillers, the adhesive strength[136], reliability[137], stiffness, and structural integrity[138] of PEEK matrix could be greatly improved. Commonly, the reinforced fillers which could be used in enhancing the performances of PEEK matrix mainly include CF[139], CNTs[140], graphene nanoplates (GNPs)[6], and other carbon-precursor fillers[141]. Li et al.[142] prepared the enhanced conductivity MWCNT/nickel-coated carbonized Loofah fiber (CLF) (Ni@CLF)/PEEK. Composites exhibited excellent electromagnetic shielding properties and outstanding compressive performance, as shown in Fig. 3.
|
Fig.3 Schematic illustration the preparation process of Ni-coated CLF (a) and MWCNT/Ni@CLF/PEEK composite (b)[142] (Reprinted with permission from Ref.[142]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society) |
Li et al.[143] fabricated GNP/CLF/PEEK composites by compressive moulding technology. The composite showed application potential in harsh environments like aerospace, warships, and special devices as structural and functional integrated materials.
Among the various reinforced fillers, CF has been the most indispensable fillers to enhance the performances of PEEK matrix. Continuous PEEK-CF composites have attracted particular attention owing to the excellent mechanical properties[144-145], thermal-assistance[146-147], and corrosion-assistance[148-149]. Caballe-Serrano et al.[33] synthesized nickel-plated CF (Ni-CF) via electroplating, and fabricated Ni-CF/PEEK composites by melt-mixing method. Conductive Ni-CF/PEEK composites are suitable for electromagnetic interference shielding. It is noteworthy that the interfacial properties between CF and PEEK matrix should be investigated and modified effectively[150-152]. Hassan et al.[153] improved the interaction between CF and PEEK through chemical grafting method. The mechanical properties were enhanced by regulating the interface of CF and PEEK.
5 Summary and OutlookThis review highlighted the basic content, synthesis pathway, and applied pattern of PEEK as well as its various applications in biomedical, machinery, energy storage, and aerospace fields. The synthesis of PEEK productions with the desired properties and the concrete modification method of PEEK based materials has been introduced and exemplified towards various fields of application, including machinery engineering, separator, and aerospace. In addition to the great biocompatibility, it has attracted broad attention for usage in biomedical implants. Apart from the PEEK materials, PEEK based composites have been applied in various fields owing to the enhanced performances. Multifunctional fillers such as CF, CNTs, GO, etc. are often employed as the candidates for reinforcing the properties of PEEK matrix. There are loads of successful attempts in developing the elaborated performances and concrete applications of PEEK based material. However, there are many challenges in practical procedures. For biomedical implants, the bioactivity and non-immunogenicity are still the major challenges for us researchers to overcome. For machinery engineering, trobilogical performances need to be modified to promote operating efficiency. The flexibility and formability should be improved when used for film separator. In aerospace fields, the stronger mechanical properties and resistance to harsh environment should be considered and investigated. As for PEEK based composites, the compatibility between PEEK and fillers should be modified to improve the properties. The existing challenge could be the development direction, which many researchers are trying to tackle. In addition, accompanied by the fast development of smart apparatus, whether PEEK material could be applied in the field of intelligent devices is worth considering and exploring. We do believe that many researchers are ready to investigate or have investigated the PEEK based smart apparatus. It is reasonable for us to have confidence that the PEEK based materials have broad application prospects in various fields, and will be employed as indispensable substitutes in the future.
|
Table |
| [1] |
Huang T, Song J F, He S F, et al. Enabling sustainable green close-loop membrane lithium extraction by acid and solvent resistant poly (ether ether ketone) membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 589: 117273. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117273 (  0) |
| [2] |
Steven M K, Devine J N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(32): 4845-4869. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 ( 0) |
| [3] |
Sébileau J-H, Lemonnier S, Barraud E, et al. Effects of pressure on poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) sintering mechanisms. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136: 47645. DOI:10.1002/app.47645 ( 0) |
| [4] |
Martineau L, Chabert F, Boniface B, et al. Effect of interfacial crystalline growth on autohesion of PEEK. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2019, 89: 82-87. DOI:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.013 ( 0) |
| [5] |
Deng H Y, Xu Y W, Lei H, et al. Novel benzimidazole and pyridine-containing poly(ether ether ketone)s with good solubility, thermal properties and fluorescence. Journal of Polymer Research, 2019, 26: 158. DOI:10.1007/s10965-019-1812-7 ( 0) |
| [6] |
Wang P, Ma R X, Wang Y M, et al. Comparative study of fullerenes and graphene nanoplatelets on the mechanical and thermomechanical properties of poly(ether ether ketone). Materials Letters, 2019, 249: 180-184. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2019.04.092 ( 0) |
| [7] |
Yasin S, Shakeel A, Ahmad M, et al. Physico-chemical analysis of semi-crystalline PEEK in aliphatic and aromatic solvents. Soft Materials, 2019, 17(2): 143-149. DOI:10.1080/1539445X.2019.1572622 ( 0) |
| [8] |
Lee J S, Ko N Y, Kwak N H, et al. Toughening of semi-IPN structured epoxy using a new PEEK-type polymer via in situ azide-alkyne click polymerization. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136: 48178. DOI:10.1002/app.48178 ( 0) |
| [9] |
da Silva Burgal J, Peeva L, Livingston A. Towards improved membrane production: using low-toxicity solvents for the preparation of PEEK nanofiltration membranes. Green Chemistry, 2016, 18: 2374-2384. DOI:10.1039/c5gc02546j ( 0) |
| [10] |
Patel P, Hull T R, McCabe R W, et al. Mechanism of thermal decomposition of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) from a review of decomposition studies. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2010, 95(5): 709-718. DOI:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.024 ( 0) |
| [11] |
Panayotov I V, Orti V, Cuisinier F, et al. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2016, 27: 118. DOI:10.1007/s10856-016-5731-4 ( 0) |
| [12] |
Colquhoun H M, Lewis D F. Synthesis of aromatic polyetherketones in trifluoromethanesulphonic acid. Polymer, 1988, 29(10): 1902-1908. DOI:10.1016/0032-3861(88)90410-7 ( 0) |
| [13] |
Shukla D, Negi Y S, Uppadhyaya J S, et al. Synthesis and modification of poly(ether ether ketone) and their properties: a review. Polymer Reviews, 2012, 52: 189-228. DOI:10.1080/15583724.2012.668151 ( 0) |
| [14] |
Wei J J, Ju T X, Huang W, et al. High dielectric constant dipolar glass polymer based on sulfonylated poly(ether ether ketone). Polymer, 2019, 178: 121688. DOI:10.1016/j.polymer.2019.121688 ( 0) |
| [15] |
Karthikeyan L, Mathew D, Robert T M. Poly(ether ether ketone)-bischromenes: synthesis, characterization, and influence on thermal, mechanical, and thermo mechanical properties of epoxy resin. Polymers Advanced Technologies, 2019, 30: 1061-1071. DOI:10.1002/pat.4539 ( 0) |
| [16] |
Campodonia E, Heggset E B, Rashad A, et al. Polymeric 3D scaffolds for tissue regeneration: evaluation of biopolymer nanocomposite reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils. Materials Science & Engineering C, 2019, 94: 867-878. DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.026 ( 0) |
| [17] |
Han X T, Sharma N, Xu Z Q, et al. An in vitro study of osteoblast response on fused-filament fabrication 3D printed PEEK for dental and Cranio-Maxillofacial implants. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2019, 8: 771. DOI:10.3390/jcm8060771 ( 0) |
| [18] |
Chen G, Chen Y, Huang T J, et al. Pore structure and properties of PEEK hollow fiber membranes: Influence of the phase structure evolution of PEEK/PEI composite. Polymers, 2019, 11: 1398. DOI:10.3390/polym11091398 ( 0) |
| [19] |
Huang T J, Chen G, He Z C, et al. Pore structure and properties of poly(ether ether ketone) hollow fiber membranes: influence of solvent-induced crystallization during extraction. Polymer International, 2019, 68(11): 1874-1880. DOI:10.1002/pi.5897 ( 0) |
| [20] |
Zhao F, Hu S H, Wang F J, et al. A sulfonated PEEK/PCL composite nanofibrous membrane for periosteum tissue engineering application. Journal of Materials Science, 2019, 54: 12012-12023. DOI:10.1007/s10853-019-03728-w ( 0) |
| [21] |
Talley S J, Vivod S L, Nguyen B A, et al. Hierarchical morphology of poly(ether ether ketone) aerogels. ACS Applied Materials Interfaces, 2019, 11: 31508-31519. DOI:10.1021/acsami.9b09699 ( 0) |
| [22] |
Chen S G, Yang J Z, Jia Y G, et al. TiO2 and PEEK reinforced 3D printing PMMA composite resin for dental denture base applications. Nanomaterials, 2019, 9: 1049. DOI:10.3390/nano9071049 ( 0) |
| [23] |
Zhou H J, Xiong D S, Tong W, et al. Lubrication behaviors of PVA-casted LSPEEK hydrogels in artificial cartilage repair. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136(37): 47944. DOI:10.1002/app.47944 ( 0) |
| [24] |
Ma R X, Zhu B, Zeng Q Q, et al. Melt-processed poly(ether ether ketone)/carbon nanotubes/montmorillonite nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical and thermomechanical properties. Materials, 2019, 12: 525. DOI:10.3390/ma12030525 ( 0) |
| [25] |
Kessentini A, Ahmed G M S, Madiouli J. Design optimization and FE analysis of 3D printed carbon PEEK based mono leaf spring. Micromachines, 2019, 10: 279. DOI:10.3390/mi10050279 ( 0) |
| [26] |
Yang S, Lei P, Shan Y J, et al. Preparation and characterization of antibacterial electrospun chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide composite nanofibrous membrane. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 435: 832-840. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.191 ( 0) |
| [27] |
Govinna D N, Keller T, Schick C, et al. Melt-electrospinning of poly(ether ether ketone) fibers to avoid sulfonation. Polymer, 2019, 171: 50-57. DOI:10.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.041 ( 0) |
| [28] |
Jung H D, Jang T S, Lee J E, et al. Enhanced bioactivity of titanium-coated polyetheretherketone implants created by a high-temperature 3D printing process. Biofabrication, 2019, 11: 045014. DOI:10.1088/1758-5090/ab376b ( 0) |
| [29] |
Vaezi M, Yang S F. A novel bioactive PEEK/HA composite with controlled 3D interconnected HA network. International Journal of Bioprinting, 2015, 1: 66-76. DOI:10.18063/IJB.2015.01.004 ( 0) |
| [30] |
Wang P, Zou B, Xiao H C, et al. Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2019, 271: 62-74. DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016 ( 0) |
| [31] |
Luo M, Tian X Y, Shang J F, et al. Impregnation and interlayer bonding behaviours of 3D-printed continuous carbon-fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone composites. Composites Part A, 2019, 121: 130-138. DOI:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.020 ( 0) |
| [32] |
Delaney L J, MacDonald D, Leung J, et al. Ultrasound-triggered antibiotic release from PEEK clips to prevent spinal fusion infection: initial evaluations. Acta Biomaterialia, 2019, 93: 12-24. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.041 ( 0) |
| [33] |
Caballe-Serrano J, Chappuis V, Monje A, et al. Soft tissue response to dental implant closure caps made of either polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2019, 30: 808-816. DOI:10.1111/clr.13487 ( 0) |
| [34] |
Venkatraman R, Rader C, Bohmann N, et al. Structure-property-processing relationship of ethanol solvent exchanged PEEK. Polymer, 2019, 169: 154-159. DOI:10.1016/j.polymer.2019.02.057 ( 0) |
| [35] |
Liang Y N, Gao D R, Chen B, et al. Friction and wear study on friction pairs with a biomimetic non smooth surface of 316L relative to CF/PEEK under a seawater lubricated condition. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 32: 66. DOI:10.1186/s10033-019-0380-4 ( 0) |
| [36] |
Järvinen S, Suojanen J, Kormi E, et al. The use of patient specific polyetheretherketone implants for reconstruction of maxillofacial deformities. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 2019, 47: 1072-1076. DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.018 ( 0) |
| [37] |
Wang Z N, Li J J, Ge X Y, et al. Investigation of the lubrication properties and synergistic interaction of biocompatible liposome-polymer complexes applicable to artificial joints. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2019, 178: 469-478. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.03.041 ( 0) |
| [38] |
Abdulkareem M H, Abdalsalam A H, Bohan A J. Influence of chitosan on the antibacterial activity of composite coating (PEEK/HAp) fabricated by electrophoretic deposition. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2019, 130: 251-259. DOI:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.01.050 ( 0) |
| [39] |
Ma J, Xue Y Z B, Liang X Y, et al. Bi-directional regulatable mechanical properties of 3D braided polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Materials Science & Engineering C, 2019, 103: 109811. DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109811 ( 0) |
| [40] |
Wei R, Wu J L, Li Y W. Macrophage polarization following three-dimensional porous PEEK. Materials Science & Engineering C, 2019, 104: 109948. DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109948 ( 0) |
| [41] |
Feng X K, Yu H, Liu H, et al. Three-dimensionally-printed polyether-ether-ketone implant with a cross-linked structure and acid-etched microporous surface promotes integration with soft tissue. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20: 3811. DOI:10.3390/ijms20153811 ( 0) |
| [42] |
Tuinea-Bobe C-L, Xia H S, Ryabenkova Y, et al. Microinjection moulded polyetheretherketone biomaterials as spinal implants: physico-chemical and mechanical characterization. Materials Research Express, 2019, 6: 035311. DOI:10.1088/2053-1591/aaf5eb ( 0) |
| [43] |
Singh S, Prakash C, Ramakrishna S. 3D printing of polyether-ether-ketone for biomedical applications. European Polymer Journal, 2019, 114: 234-248. DOI:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.02.035 ( 0) |
| [44] |
Li Y, Wang D L, Qin W, et al. Mechanical properties, hemocompatibility, cytotoxicity and systemic toxicity of carbon fibers/poly(ether-ether-ketone) composites with different fiber lengths as orthopedic implants. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 2019, 30(18): 1709-1724. DOI:10.1080/09205063.2019.1659711 ( 0) |
| [45] |
Benz K, Schöbel A, Dietz M, et al. Adhesion behaviour of primary human osteoblasts and fibroblasts on polyether ether ketone compared with titanium under in vitro lipopolysaccharide incubation. Materials, 2019, 12: 2739. DOI:10.3390/ma12172739 ( 0) |
| [46] |
Ramenzoni L L, Attin T, Schmidlin P R. In vitro effect of modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implant abutments on human gingival epithelial keratinocytes migration and proliferation. Materials, 2019, 12: 1401. DOI:10.3390/ma12091401 ( 0) |
| [47] |
Benakatti V B, Sajjanar J A, Acharya A. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in dentistry. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2019, 13(8): ZE10-ZE12. DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2019/41965.13103 ( 0) |
| [48] |
Monich P R, Henriques B, de Oliveira A P N, et al. Mechanical and biological behavior of biomedical PEEK matrix composites: a focused review. Materials Letters, 2016, 185: 593-597. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.005 ( 0) |
| [49] |
Zhang J B, Tian W Q, Chen J Y, et al. The application of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in cranioplasty. Brain Research Bulletin, 2019, 153: 143-149. DOI:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.08.010 ( 0) |
| [50] |
Ma R, Tang T T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, 15: 5426-5445. DOI:10.3390/ijms15045426 ( 0) |
| [51] |
Przykaza K, Woźniak K, Jurak M, et al. Wetting properties of polyetheretherketone plasma activated and biocoated surfaces. Colloids Interfaces, 2019, 3: 40. DOI:10.3390/colloids3010040 ( 0) |
| [52] |
Mao G W, Qin Z L, Li Z, et al. A tricalcium phosphate/polyether ether ketone anchor bionic fixation device for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: safety and efficacy in a beagle model. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B, 2019, 107: 554-563. DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.34146 ( 0) |
| [53] |
Panayotov I V, Orti V, Cuisinier F, et al. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2016, 27: 118. DOI:10.1007/s10856-016-5731-4 ( 0) |
| [54] |
Mangano F, Mangano C, Margiani B, et al. Combining intraoral and face scans for the design and fabrication of computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) implant-supported bars for maxillary overdentures. Scanning, 2019, 4274715. DOI:10.1155/2019/4274715 ( 0) |
| [55] |
Mishra S, Chowdhary R. PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: a systematic review. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2019, 21: 208-222. DOI:10.1111/cid.12706 ( 0) |
| [56] |
Wan T, Li L L, Guo M, et al. Immobilization via polydopamine of dual growth factors on polyetheretherketone: improvement of cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteo-differentiation. Journal of Materials Science, 2019, 54: 11179-11196. DOI:10.1007/s10853-018-03264-z ( 0) |
| [57] |
Omrani M M, Hadjizadeh A. Surface modification of poly (ether ether ketone) with a Medlite C6 (ND-YAG Q-Switched) skin treatment laser. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B, 2019, 58: 783-793. DOI:10.1080/00222348.2019.1639329 ( 0) |
| [58] |
Younis M, Unkovskiy A, ElAyouti A, et al. The effect of various plasma gases on the shear bond strength between unfilled polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and veneering composite following artificial aging. Materials, 2019, 12: 1447. DOI:10.3390/ma12091447 ( 0) |
| [59] |
Khoury J, Selezneva I, Pestov S, et al. Surface bioactivation of PEEK by neutral atom beam technology. Bioactive Materials, 2019, 4: 132-141. DOI:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.02.001 ( 0) |
| [60] |
Zhu C G, Zhao D M, Wang K D, et al. Direct laser writing of graphene films from a polyether ether ketone precursor. Journal of Materials Science, 2019, 54: 4192-4201. DOI:10.1007/s10853-018-3123-5 ( 0) |
| [61] |
Barkarmo S, Longhorn D, Leer K, et al. Biofilm formation on polyetheretherketone and titanium surfaces. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 2019, 5: 427-437. DOI:10.1002/cre2.205 ( 0) |
| [62] |
Wang S N, Yang Y Y, Li Y F, et al. Strontium/adiponectin co-decoration modulates the osteogenic activity of nano-morphologic polyetheretherketone implant. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2019, 176: 38-46. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.12.056 ( 0) |
| [63] |
Hwang S, Lim S H, Han S. Highly adhesive and bioactive Ti-Mg alloy thin film on polyether ether ketone formed by PIII&D technique. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 471: 878-886. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.080 ( 0) |
| [64] |
Yuan X W, Ouyang L P, Luo Y, et al. Multifunctional sulfonated polyetheretherketone coating with betadefensin-14 for yielding durable and broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and osseointegration. Acta Biomaterialia, 2019, 86: 323-337. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.016 ( 0) |
| [65] |
Kambe Y, Mahara A, Tanaka H, et al. Short-term evaluation of thromboresistance of a poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) mechanical heart valve with poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC)-grafted surface in a porcine aortic valve replacement model. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2019, 107: 1052-1063. DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.36628 ( 0) |
| [66] |
Masamoto K, Fujibayashi S, Yabutsuka T, et al. In vivo and in vitro bioactivity of a "precursor of apatite" treatment on polyetheretherketone. Acta Biomaterialia, 2019, 91: 48-59. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.041 ( 0) |
| [67] |
Cheng Q W, Yuan B, Chen X N, et al. Regulation of surface micro/nano structure and composition of polyetheretherketone and their influence on the behavior of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2019, 7: 5713-5724. DOI:10.1039/C9TB00943D ( 0) |
| [68] |
Zhu Y C, Cao Z, Peng Y, et al. Facile surface modification method for synergistically enhancing the biocompatibility and bioactivity of poly(ether ether ketone) that induced osteodifferentiation. ACS Applied Materials Interfaces, 2019, 11: 27503-27511. DOI:10.1021/acsami.9b03030 ( 0) |
| [69] |
Najeeb S, Zafar M S, Khurshid Z, et al. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2016, 60: 12-19. DOI:10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001 ( 0) |
| [70] |
Chen D W, Lee K-Y, Tsai M-H, et al. Antibacterial application on staphylococcus aureus using antibiotic agent/zinc oxide nanorod arrays/polyethylethylketone composite samples. Nanomaterials, 2019, 9: 713. DOI:10.3390/nano9050713 ( 0) |
| [71] |
Siebert L, Schaller T, Schutt F, et al. Perfect polymer interlocking by spherical particles: capillary force shapes hierarchical composite undercuts. Nanoscale Horizons, 2019, 4: 947-952. DOI:10.1039/C9NH00083F ( 0) |
| [72] |
Major L, Lackner J M, Kot M, et al. Correlative microscopic characterization of biomechanical and biomimetic advanced CVD coatings on a PEEK substrate. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2019, 134: 244-254. DOI:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.05.012 ( 0) |
| [73] |
Cruz-Pacheco A F, Muñoz-Castiblanco D T, Cuaspud J A G, et al. Coating of polyetheretherketone films with silver nanoparticles by a simple chemical reduction method and their antibacterial activity. Coatings, 2019, 9: 91. DOI:10.3390/coatings9020019 ( 0) |
| [74] |
He M M, Chen X C, Guo Z J, et al. Super tough graphene oxide reinforced polyetheretherketone for potential hard tissue repair applications. Composites Science and Technology, 2019, 174: 194-201. DOI:10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.02.028 ( 0) |
| [75] |
Trindade R, Albrektsson T, Galli S, et al. Bone immune response to materials, Part II: copper and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) compared to titanium at 10 and 28 days in rabbit tibia. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2019, 8: 814. DOI:10.3390/jcm8060814 ( 0) |
| [76] |
Punchak M, Chung L K, Lagman C, et al. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2017, 41: 30-35. DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2017.03.028 ( 0) |
| [77] |
Kersten R F M R, Wu G, Pouran B, et al. Comparison of polyetheretherketone versus silicon nitride intervertebral spinal spacers in a caprine model. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B, 2019, 107B: 688-699. DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.3416 ( 0) |
| [78] |
Zhu H, Ji X F, Guan H F, et al. Tantalum nanoparticles reinforced polyetheretherketone shows enhanced bone formation. Materials Science & Engineering C, 2019, 101: 232-242. DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.091 ( 0) |
| [79] |
Mei S Q, Yang L L, Pan Y K, et al. Influences of tantalum pentoxide and surface coarsening on surface roughness, hydrophilicity, surface energy, protein adsorption and cell responses to PEEK based biocomposite. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2019, 174: 207-215. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.081 ( 0) |
| [80] |
Chu L Y, Li R, Liao Z H, et al. Highly effective bone fusion induced by the interbody cage made of calcium silicate/polyetheretherketone in a goat model. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2019, 5: 2409-2416. DOI:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01193 ( 0) |
| [81] |
Souza J C M, Correia M S T, Henriques B, et al. Micro-scale abrasion wear of novel biomedical PEEK-matrix composites for restorative dentistry. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 2019, 7: 015019. DOI:10.1088/2051-672X/ab0324 ( 0) |
| [82] |
Xu X, Li Y L, Wang L X, et al. Triple-functional polyetheretherketone surface with enhanced bacteriostasis and anti-inflammatory and osseointegrative properties for implant application. Biomaterials, 2019, 212: 98-114. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.014 ( 0) |
| [83] |
He X H, Deng Y, Yu Y, et al. Drug-loaded/grafted peptide-modified porous PEEK to promote bone tissue repair and eliminate bacteria. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2019, 181: 767-777. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.038 ( 0) |
| [84] |
Tomoglu S, Caner G, Arabaci A, et al. Production and sulfonation of bioactive polyetheretherketone foam for bone substitute applications. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials, 2019, 68(18): 1167-1176. DOI:10.1080/00914037.2018.1539985 ( 0) |
| [85] |
Raina D B, Larsson D, Sezgin E A, et al. Biomodulation of an implant for enhanced bone-implant anchorage. Acta Biomaterialia, 2019, 96: 619-630. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.009 ( 0) |
| [86] |
Ye J, Deng J, Chen Y T, et al. Cicada and catkin inspired dual biomimetic antibacterial structure for the surface modification of implant material. Biomaterials Science, 2019, 7: 2826-2832. DOI:10.1039/C9BM00082H ( 0) |
| [87] |
Cao J F, Lu Y, Chen H C, et al. Preparation, properties and in vitro cellular response of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/bioactive glass/poly(etheretherketone) biocomposite for bone tissue engineering. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials, 2019, 68(8): 433-441. DOI:10.1080/00914037.2018.1455679 ( 0) |
| [88] |
Adler D, Akbar M, Spicher A, et al. Biomechanical study of a novel, expandable, non-metallic and radiolucent CF/PEEK vertebral body replacement (VBR). Materials, 2019, 12: 2732. DOI:10.3390/ma12172732 ( 0) |
| [89] |
Koh Y-G, Park K-M, Lee J-A, et al. Total knee arthroplasty application of polyetheretherketone and carbonfiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone: a review. Materials Science & Engineering C, 2019, 100: 70-81. DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.082 ( 0) |
| [90] |
Milavec H, Kellner C, Ravikumar N, et al. First clinical experience with a carbon fibre reinforced PEEK composite plating system for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 2019, 10: 29. DOI:10.3390/jfb10030029 ( 0) |
| [91] |
Liu L, Xiao L H, Zhang X P, et al. Improvement of the thermal conductivity and friction performance of poly(ether ether ketone)/carbon fiber laminates by addition of graphene. RSC Advances, 2015, 5: 57853-57859. DOI:10.1039/C5RA10722A ( 0) |
| [92] |
Li Q S, Zhao W, Li Y X, et al. Flexural properties and fracture behavior of CF/PEEK in orthogonal building orientation by FDM: microstructure and mechanism. Polymers, 2019, 11: 656. DOI:10.3390/polym11040656 ( 0) |
| [93] |
Han X T, Yang D, Yang C C, et al. Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites based on 3D-printing technology for orthopedic and dental applications. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2019, 8: 240. DOI:10.3390/jcm8020240 ( 0) |
| [94] |
Bonnheim N, Ansari F, Regis M, et al. Effect of carbon fiber type on monotonic and fatigue properties of orthopedic grade PEEK. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2019, 90: 484-492. DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.033 ( 0) |
| [95] |
Peng T-Y, Ogawa Y, Akebono H, et al. Finite-element analysis and optimization of the mechanical properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) clasps for removable partial dentures. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2020, 64(3): 250-256. DOI:10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.012 ( 0) |
| [96] |
Wachtel A, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, et al. Bacterial leakage and bending moments of screw-retained, compositeveneered PEEK implant crowns. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2019, 91: 32-37. DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.11.027 ( 0) |
| [97] |
Sarot J R, Contar C M M, da Cruz A C C, et al. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2010, 21: 2079-2085. DOI:10.1007/s10856-010-4084-7 ( 0) |
| [98] |
Zorko D, Kulovec S, Duhovnik J, et al. Durability and design parameters of a Steel/PEEK gear pair. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, 140: 825-846. DOI:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.07.001 ( 0) |
| [99] |
da SilvaBurgal J, Peeva L, Livingston A. Negligible ageing in poly(ether-ether-ketone) membranes widens application range for solvent processing. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 525: 48-56. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.015 ( 0) |
| [100] |
Xu H D, Zhang D K, Chen K, et al. Taper fretting behavior of PEEK artificial hip joint. Tribology International, 2019, 137: 30-38. DOI:10.1016/j.triboint.2019.04.027 ( 0) |
| [101] |
Brassard D, Dubé M, Tavare J R. Resistance welding of thermoplastic composites with a nanocomposite heating element. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 165: 779-784. DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.038 ( 0) |
| [102] |
Puhan D, Wong J S S. Properties of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) transferred materials in a PEEK steel contact. Tribology International, 2019, 135: 189-199. DOI:10.1016/j.triboint.2019.02.028 ( 0) |
| [103] |
Hamilton S, Muñoz-Escalona P. Enhancement of wear properties of a polyether ether ketone polymer by incorporation of carbon and glass fibers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136: 47587. DOI:10.1002/app.47587 ( 0) |
| [104] |
Puhan D, Wong J S S. Properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) transferred materials in a PEEK steel contact. Tribology International, 2019, 135: 189-199. DOI:10.1016/j.triboint.2019.02.028 ( 0) |
| [105] |
Pei X Q, Lin L, Schlarb A K, et al. Correlation of friction and wear across length scales for PEEK sliding against steel. Tribology International, 2019, 136: 462-468. DOI:10.1016/j.triboint.2019.04.001 ( 0) |
| [106] |
Yin F L, Zhou X, Nie S L, et al. Tribocorrosion behavior of several corrosion-resistant alloys sliding against CF-PEEK: application for hydraulic valve in seawater. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2019, 14: 4643-4658. DOI:10.20964/2019.05.66 ( 0) |
| [107] |
Chen C Y, Zhang C, Zhao Z Q, et al. Effect of fiber reinforcement and fabrication process on the dynamic compressive behavior of PEEK composites. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019, 155: 170-177. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.034 ( 0) |
| [108] |
Lin L, Pei X Q, Bennewitz R, et al. Tribological response of PEEK to temperature induced by frictional and external heating. Tribology Letters, 2019, 67: 52. DOI:10.1007/s11249-019-1169-4 ( 0) |
| [109] |
Nie S L, Lou F L, Ji H, et al. Tribological performance of CF-PEEK sliding against 17-4PH stainless steel with various cermet coatings for water hydraulic piston pump application. Coating, 2019, 9: 436. DOI:10.3390/coatings9070436 ( 0) |
| [110] |
Kruk A, Zimowski S, Łukaszczyk A, et al. The influence of heat treatment on the microstructure, surface topography and selected properties of PEEK coatings electrophoretically deposited on the Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2019, 133: 180-190. DOI:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.04.049 ( 0) |
| [111] |
Miyagaki A, Kamaya Y, Matsumoto T, et al. Surface modification of poly(ether ether ketone) through Friedel-Crafts reaction for high adhesion strength. Langmuir, 2019, 35: 9761-9768. DOI:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00641 ( 0) |
| [112] |
Lin L, Schlarb A K. Tribological response of the PEEK/SCF/graphite composite by releasing rigid particles into the tribosystem. Tribology International, 2019, 137: 173-179. DOI:10.1016/j.triboint.2019.05.002 ( 0) |
| [113] |
Liu H B, Su X Q, Tao J, et al. Influence of cenosphere on tribological properties of short carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136: 47245. DOI:10.1002/app.47245 ( 0) |
| [114] |
Bartolomeu F, Abreua C S, Moura C G, et al. Ti6Al4V-PEEK multi-material structures-design, fabrication and tribological characterization focused on orthopedic implants. Tribology International, 2019, 131: 672-678. DOI:10.1016/j.triboint.2018.11.017 ( 0) |
| [115] |
Lu Z H, Liu H J, Zhu C C, et al. Identification of failure modes of a PEEK-steel gear pair under lubrication. International Journal of Fatigue, 2019, 125: 342-348. DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.004 ( 0) |
| [116] |
Borba N Z, dos Santos J F, Amancio-Filho S T. The influence of clamping pressure on joint formation and mechanical performance of Ti6Al4V/CF-PEEK friction-riveted joints. Materials, 2019, 12: 745. DOI:10.3390/mal12050745 ( 0) |
| [117] |
Hassan E A M, Yang L L, Elagib T H H, et al. Synergistic effect of hydrogen bonding and π-π stacking in interface of CF/PEEK composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 171: 70-77. DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.015 ( 0) |
| [118] |
Zhai S X, Dai W X, Lin J, et al. Enhanced proton conductivity in sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membranes by incorporating sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate. Polymers, 2019, 11: 203. DOI:10.3390/polym11020203 ( 0) |
| [119] |
Liu J C, Mo Y D, Wang S J, et al. Ultrastrong and heat-resistant poly(ether ether ketone) separator for dendrite-proof and heat-resistant lithium-ion batteries. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2019, 2: 3886-3895. DOI:10.1021/acsaem.9b00568 ( 0) |
| [120] |
Zhang Z H, Xiao X L, Yan X, et al. Highly conductive anion exchange membranes based on one-step benzylation modification of poly(ether ether ketone). Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 574: 205-211. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.080 ( 0) |
| [121] |
Li D, Shi D Q, Feng K, et al. Poly (ether ether ketone) (PEEK) porous membranes with super high thermal stability and high rate capability for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 530: 125-131. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.027 ( 0) |
| [122] |
Iulianelli A, Basile A. Sulfonated PEEK-based polymers in PEMFC and DMFC applications: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 15241-15255. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.063 ( 0) |
| [123] |
Li J, Niu X H, Song J F, et al. Harvesting vapor by hygroscopic acid to create pore: morphology, crystallinity and performance of poly (ether ether ketone) lithium ion battery separator. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 577: 1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.01.045 ( 0) |
| [124] |
Dogğan H, Inan T Y, Koral M, et al. Organo-montmorillonites and sulfonated PEEK nanocomposite membranes for fuel cell applications. Applied Clay Science, 2011, 52: 285-294. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2011.03.007 ( 0) |
| [125] |
Babu D B, Giribabu K, Ramesha K. Permselective SPEEK/nafion composite-coated separator as a potential polysulfide crossover barrier layer for Li-S batteries. ACS Applied Materials Interfaces, 2018, 10: 19721-19729. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b04888 ( 0) |
| [126] |
Li H, Zhang B, Liu W, et al. Effects of an electrospun fluorinated poly(ether ether ketone) separator on the enhanced safety and electrochemical properties of lithium ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 290: 150-164. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.075 ( 0) |
| [127] |
Li Z, Cao T T, Zhang Z, et al. Novel lithium ion battery separator based on hydroxymethyl functionalized poly(ether ether ketone). Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 540: 422-429. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.045 ( 0) |
| [128] |
Barile C, Casavola C, De Cillis F. Mechanical comparison of new composite materials for aerospace applications. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 162: 122-128. DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.101 ( 0) |
| [129] |
Rikitoku S, Otake S, Nozaki K, et al. Influence of SiO2 content of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) on flexural properties and tensile bond strength to resin cement. Dental Materials Journal, 2019, 38(3): 464-470. DOI:10.4012/dmj.2018-234 ( 0) |
| [130] |
Kurahashi K, Matsuda T, Ishida Y, et al. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of polyetheretherketone to autopolymerizing resin. Dentistry Journal, 2019, 7: 82. DOI:10.3390/dj7030082 ( 0) |
| [131] |
Pascual A, Toma M, Tsotra P, et al. On the stability of PEEK for short processing cycles at high temperatures and oxygen-containing atmosphere. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2019, 165: 161-169. DOI:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.04.025 ( 0) |
| [132] |
Kalra S, Munjal B S, Singh V R, et al. Investigations on the suitability of PEEK material under space environment conditions and its application in a parabolic space antenna. Advances in Space Research, 2019, 63: 4039-4045. DOI:10.1016/j.asr.2019.03.006 ( 0) |
| [133] |
Yang X Q, Zhao J N, Wu K J, et al. Making a strong adhesion between polyetherketoneketone and carbon nanotube fiber through an electro strategy. Composites Science and Technology, 2019, 177: 81-87. DOI:10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.04.015 ( 0) |
| [134] |
Veazey D, Hsu T, Gomez E D. Enhancing resistance of poly(ether ketone ketone) to high-temperature steam through crosslinking and crystallization control. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136(27): 47727. DOI:10.1002/app.47727 ( 0) |
| [135] |
Vieille B, Gonzalez J D P, Bouvet C. Prediction of the ultimate strength of quasi-isotropic TP-based laminates structures from tensile and compressive fracture toughness at high temperature. Composites Part B, 2019, 164: 437-446. DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.056 ( 0) |
| [136] |
Kumar K A, Bijwe J, Kalappa P. High temperature performance of composite adhesives based on PEEK and boron carbide particles. Polymer Composites, 2019, 40: 2473-2481. DOI:10.1002/pc.25124 ( 0) |
| [137] |
Ata S, Hayashi Y, Thi T B N, et al. Improving thermal durability and mechanical properties of poly(ether ether ketone) with single-walled carbon nanotubes. Polymers, 2019, 176: 60-65. DOI:10.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.028 ( 0) |
| [138] |
Papageorgiou D G, Liu M F, Li Z H, et al. Hybrid poly(ether ether ketone) composites reinforced with a combination of carbon fibres and graphene nanoplatelets. Composites Science and Technology, 2019, 175: 60-68. DOI:10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.006 ( 0) |
| [139] |
Li S, Jin Y, Wang Z Y, et al. Preparation and characterisation of nickel-plated carbon fibre/polyether ether ketone composites with high electromagnetic shielding and high thermal conductivity. Colloid and Polymer Science, 2019, 297: 967-977. DOI:10.1007/s00396-019-04522-5 ( 0) |
| [140] |
Hsu C-Y, Scrafford K, Ni C Y, et al. Study of tensile properties of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyether ether ketone polymer composites at the nanoscale. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2019, 59: 1209-1214. DOI:10.1002/pen.25103 ( 0) |
| [141] |
Liensdorf T, Langhof N, Krenkel W. Mechanical properties of PEEK-derived C/SiC composites with different fiber lengths. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2019, 21: 1800835. DOI:10.1002/adem.201800835 ( 0) |
| [142] |
Li S T, Li J Y, Ma N, et al. Super-compression-resistant multiwalled carbon nanotube/nickel-coated carbonized loofah fiber/polyether ether ketone composite with excellent electromagnetic shielding performance. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7: 13970-13980. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02447 ( 0) |
| [143] |
Li S T, Li W C, Nie J, et al. Synergistic effect of graphene nanoplate and carbonized loofah fiber on the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of PEEK-based composites. Carbon, 2019, 143: 154-161. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.015 ( 0) |
| [144] |
Veazey D, Hsu T, Gomez E D. Enhancing resistance of poly(ether ketone ketone) to high-temperature steam through crosslinking and crystallization control. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136: 47727. DOI:10.1002/app.47727 ( 0) |
| [145] |
Zhu K L, Tan H S, Wang Y J, et al. Crystallization and mechanical properties of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polyether-ether-ketone composites. Fibers and Polymers, 2019, 20(4): 839-846. DOI:10.1007/s12221-019-8791-5 ( 0) |
| [146] |
Zheng B, Gao X P, Li M Y, et al. Formability and failure mechanisms of woven CF/PEEK composite sheet in solid-state thermoforming. Polymers, 2019, 11: 966. DOI:10.3390/polym11060966 ( 0) |
| [147] |
Chen J L, Zhang T, Wang K, et al. Multiscale enhancement behavior of nano-silica modified CF/PEEK composites prepared by wet powder impregnation. Polymer Composites, 2019, 40: 1187-1197. DOI:10.1002/pc.24830 ( 0) |
| [148] |
Bandaru A K, Clancy G, Peeters D, et al. Properties of a thermoplastic composite skin-stiffener interface in a stiffened structure manufactured by laser-assisted tape placement with in situ consolidation. Composite Structures, 2019, 214: 123-131. DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.011 ( 0) |
| [149] |
Gao X P, Huang Z G, Zhou H M, et al. Higher mechanical performances of CF/PEEK composite laminates via reducing interlayer porosity based on the affinity of functional s-PEEK. Polymer Composites, 2019, 40: 3749-3757. DOI:10.1002/pc.25236 ( 0) |
| [150] |
Lu C R, Wang J, Lu X, et al. Wettability and interfacial properties of carbon fiber and poly(ether ether ketone) fiber hybrid composite. ACS Applied Materials Interfaces, 2019, 11: 31520-31531. DOI:10.1021/acsami.9b09735 ( 0) |
| [151] |
Li N, Chen J L, Liu H S, et al. Effect of preheat treatment on carbon fiber surface properties and fiber/PEEK interfacial behavior. Polymer Composites, 2019, 40: E1407-E1415. DOI:10.1002/pc.25020 ( 0) |
| [152] |
Lu C R, Qiu S, Lu X, et al. Enhancing the interfacial strength of carbon fiber/poly(ether ether ketone) hybrid composites by plasma treatments. Polymers, 2019, 11: 753. DOI:10.3390/polym11050753. ( 0) |
| [153] |
Hassan E A M, Elagib T H H, Memon H, et al. Surface modification of carbon fibers by grafting PEEK-NH2 for improving interfacial adhesion with polyetheretherketone. Materials, 2019, 12: 778. DOI:10.3390/ma12050778 ( 0) |