Please submit manuscripts in either of the following two submission systems

    ScholarOne Manuscripts

  • ScholarOne

    • 勤云稿件系统

  • 登录

Search by Issue

  • 2024 Vol.31
  • 2023 Vol.30
  • 2022 Vol.29
  • 2021 Vol.28
  • 2020 Vol.27
  • 2019 Vol.26
  • 2018 Vol.25
  • 2017 Vol.24
  • 2016 vol.23
  • 2015 vol.22
  • 2014 vol.21
  • 2013 vol.20
  • 2012 vol.19
  • 2011 vol.18
  • 2010 vol.17
  • 2009 vol.16
  • No.1
  • No.2

Search by Keywords

  • Search by Title
  • Search by Keywords
  • Search by Abstract
  • Search by Author's Chinese Name
  • Search by Author's English Name
  • Search by Fund

News & AnnouncementMORE

Supervised by Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of The People's Republic of China Sponsored by Harbin Institute of Technology Editor-in-chief Yu Zhou ISSNISSN 1005-9113 CNCN 23-1378/T

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
Related citation:Ya-Fen Han,Xin-Lin Xia,He-Ping Tan.Comparison of Lattice Boltzmann Method and Monte Carlo Method for Modeling Phonon Heat Conduction[J].Journal of Harbin Institute Of Technology(New Series),2013,20(5):75-80.DOI:10.11916/j.issn.1005-9113.2013.05.014.
【Print】   【HTML】   【PDF download】   【View/Add Comment】  【Download reader】  【 Close 】
←Previous|Next→ Back Issue    Advanced Search
This paper has been: browsed 2028times   downloaded 805times 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫！
Shared by: Wechat More
Font:larger+|default|smaller-
Comparison of Lattice Boltzmann Method and Monte Carlo Method for Modeling Phonon Heat Conduction
Author NameAffiliation
Ya-Fen Han School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China 
Xin-Lin Xia School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China 
He-Ping Tan School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China 
Abstract:
In order to investigate the applicability and performance of the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) and the Monte Carlo Method (MCM) to simulate phonon heat transfer, a problem of phonon heat transfer in square geometry structures of silicon dioxide was taken as an example to compare the calculational results and analyze computational efficiency of the two methods. Moreover, this work analyzed the numerical stability for two methods. The results indicate that the MCM takes much more computation time than the LBM in the same condition. In addition, the results of the two methods have a good agreement in diffusive and diffusive-ballistic domain for investigating the phonon heat transfer. So they can be used to verify each other when the experiments of energy transport in these domains faces difficulty. In ballistic domain, duo to the random error, the temperature distribution curve from MCM is fluctuant.
Key words:  LBM  MCM  temperature distributions  computational efficiency
DOI：10.11916/j.issn.1005-9113.2013.05.014
Clc Number:TP124
Fund:

LINKS

Copyright © The Editorial Department of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
Address: 92 West Dazhi Street, Nan Gang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China Postcode: 150001
(C)2015 JOURNAL OF HIT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ICP. 0000423255