Please submit manuscripts in either of the following two submission systems

    ScholarOne Manuscripts

  • ScholarOne

    • 勤云稿件系统

  • 登录

Search by Issue

  • 2024 Vol.31
  • 2023 Vol.30
  • 2022 Vol.29
  • 2021 Vol.28
  • 2020 Vol.27
  • 2019 Vol.26
  • 2018 Vol.25
  • 2017 Vol.24
  • 2016 vol.23
  • 2015 vol.22
  • 2014 vol.21
  • 2013 vol.20
  • 2012 vol.19
  • 2011 vol.18
  • 2010 vol.17
  • 2009 vol.16
  • No.1
  • No.2

Search by Keywords

  • Search by Title
  • Search by Keywords
  • Search by Abstract
  • Search by Author's Chinese Name
  • Search by Author's English Name
  • Search by Fund

News & AnnouncementMORE

Supervised by Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of The People's Republic of China Sponsored by Harbin Institute of Technology Editor-in-chief Yu Zhou ISSNISSN 1005-9113 CNCN 23-1378/T

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
Related citation:Richard E Overill.Quantifying Likelihood in Digital Forensic Investigations[J].Journal of Harbin Institute Of Technology(New Series),2014,21(6):1-4.DOI:10.11916/j.issn.1005-9113.2014.06.001.
【Print】   【HTML】   【PDF download】   【View/Add Comment】  【Download reader】  【 Close 】
←Previous|Next→ Back Issue    Advanced Search
This paper has been: browsed 1241times   downloaded 941times 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫！
Shared by: Wechat More
Font:larger+|default|smaller-
Quantifying Likelihood in Digital Forensic Investigations
Author NameAffiliation
Richard E Overill Department of Informatics, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom 
Abstract:
While the conventional forensic scientists routinely validate and express the results of their investigations quantitatively using statistical measures from probability theory, digital forensics examiners rarely if ever do so. In this paper, we review some of the quantitative tools and techniques which are available for use in digital forensic investigations, including Bayesian networks, complexity theory, information theory and probability theory, and indicate how they may be used to obtain likelihood ratios or odds ratios for the relative plausibility of alternative explanations for the creation of the recovered digital evidence. The potential benefits of such quantitative measures for modern digital forensics are also outlined.
Key words:  likelihood ratio  odds ratio  Bayesian network  power law statistics, probability theory  complexity theory  information theory
DOI：10.11916/j.issn.1005-9113.2014.06.001
Clc Number:TP39
Fund:

LINKS

Copyright © The Editorial Department of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
Address: 92 West Dazhi Street, Nan Gang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China Postcode: 150001
(C)2015 JOURNAL OF HIT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ICP. 0000423255