Author Name | Affiliation | Yuan Zhou | Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 21098, China | Jie Bian | Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 21098, China | Hui Tao | Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute Set Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China | Jingming Xu | College of Mathematics, Physics and Information Engineering, Anhui Science and Technology University, Chuzhou 233100, China |
|
Abstract: |
In order to accelerate the consolidation of the dredged sludge and look for an effective material for mud-water separation, the study on the comparison of geotextiles is carried on. It is based on the laboratory model test of aeration vacuum rapid mud-water separating (AVMWS) technique and evaluated by the cumulative weight of pumping water, the decrease of moisture content and the stable pumping speed. The results show that woven fabric is the best anti-clogging aeration vacuum material, followed by machine-woven fabric and non-woven fabric is the worst. The analysis has been proposed from two aspects of geotextile weaving technology and aeration vacuum condition. |
Key words: aeration vacuum geotextile mud-water separation comparison |
DOI:10.11916/j.issn.1005-9113.2016.04.004 |
Clc Number:TP391.7 |
Fund: |