不同厌氧方式对连续流亚硝化恢复的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.水质科学与水环境恢复工程北京市重点实验室(北京工业大学), 北京100124; 2.城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室(哈尔滨工业大学), 哈尔滨150090)

作者简介:

张杰(1938—),男,教授,中国工程院院士; 李冬(1976—),女,教授,博士生导师

通讯作者:

李冬,lidong2006@bjut.edu.cn

中图分类号:

X703.1

基金项目:

北京市长城学者项目;北京市市委组织部青年拔尖团队项目(2014000026833TD02)


Effects of different anaerobic modes on recovery of partial nitrification in continuous flow process
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering(Beijing University of Technology), Beijing 100124,China;2.State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (Harbin Institute of Technology), Harbin 150090, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究不同厌氧运行方式对亚硝化恢复的影响, 在常温(20±2) ℃下, 采用两组两级连续搅拌反应器(CSTR)1#和2#, 实验分为S1、S2和S3三个阶段.在S1阶段1#采用厌氧/厌氧运行(两级DO均为0~0.1 mg/L), 2#采用厌氧/好氧运行(两级DO分别为0~0.1和0.6~0.8 mg/L); 在S2阶段1#转变为好氧/好氧运行(两级DO分别为0.2~0.4和0.6~0.8 mg/L), 2#保持厌氧/好氧不变(两级DO分别为0~0.1和0.6~0.8 mg/L); 在S3阶段, 研究恢复后亚硝化的稳定性, 此时1#、2#两级DO均为1.0~1.2 mg/L.分别对此过程中亚硝化的恢复时间以及恢复后稳定性进行比较.结果表明, 1#的恢复时间比2#缩短了12 d, 但当溶解氧增加到1.0~1.2 mg/L时, 2#恢复后的亚硝化更稳定.先厌氧/厌氧(两级DO均为0~0.1 mg/L)后好氧/好氧运行(两级DO分别为0.2~0.4和0.6~0.8 mg/L), 有利于亚硝化的快速恢复, 恢复后转变为厌氧/好氧运行(两级DO分别为0~0.1和0.6~0.8 mg/L)有助于亚硝化的长期稳定运行.

    Abstract:

    To investigate different effects of anaerobic modes on recovery of partial nitrification (PN), two-stage continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTR)1# and 2# were used at room temperature (20±2) ℃. The experiment had three stages (S1, S2 and S3). During S1, 1# was maintained anaerobic / anaerobic (DO: 0-0. 1, 0-0. 1 mg / L), 2# was maintained anaerobic / oxic (DO: 0-0. 1, 0. 6-0. 8 mg / L). During S2, 1# was maintained oxic / oxic (DO: 0. 2-0. 4, 0. 6-0. 8 mg / L), 2# was continually maintained anaerobic / oxic (DO: 0-0. 1, 0. 6-0. 8 mg / L). To investigate stability of PN after recovery, S3 was carried out. During S3, 1# and 2# was maintained oxic / oxic (DO: 1. 0-1. 2, 1. 0-1. 2 mg / L) The following paremeters (time of recovery of PN and stability of PN) were investigated. It demonstrated that the recovery time of 1# was shorter than that of 2# by 12 d. However, PN in 2# was more stable when DO increased to 1. 0-1. 2 mg / L. Efficient PN could be recovered by the mode of first anaerobic / anaerobic (DO: 0-0. 1, 0-0. 1 mg / L) then oxic / oxic (DO: 0. 2-0. 4, 0. 6-0. 8 mg / L). Afterwards, stable PN could be maintained by anaerobic / oxic (DO: 0-0. 1, 0. 6-0. 8 mg / L).

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张杰,张艳辉,李冬,梁瑜海,关宏伟,赵世勋.不同厌氧方式对连续流亚硝化恢复的影响[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2017,49(2):1. DOI:10.11918/j. issn.0367-6234.2017.02.001

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-12
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-01-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码