Comparison of effects on partial nitrification between anoxic-oxic and controling DO /HRT process
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering(Beijing University of Technology), Beijing 100124,China;2.State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment(Harbin Institute of Technology),Harbin 150090,China)

Clc Number:

X703.1

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    To compare the effect of two different operational modes on partial nitrification (PN), two-stage continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTR) 1# (anoxic-oxic) and 2# (controlling DO and HRT) were constructed and operated at room temperature (18-22℃). Start-up time, stability, aeration consumption, sludge settling ability, as well as the adaptability to the decreasing of ammonia nitrogen concentration were investigated. PN in 1# and 2# were accomplished in 26 d and 41 d, respectively. When the effluent of an anaerobic/oxic (A/O) process for phosphorous removing (containing ammonia nitrogen 35-43 mg/L) was used as influent, PN was stable both under 1# and 2# condition, however, aeration consumption could be reduced by about 20% in 2#. When the ammonia nitrogen decreasing from 43 to 27 mg/L, PN in 1# would be unstable and the rates of PN decreased to 67.39%. For comparison, PN in 2# could be maintained stable with an ammonia removal rate of >88%. Settleability of sludge was good both in 1# and 2#. Rapid start-up could be achieved through controlling DO and HRT, and a stable and efficient PN could be maintained through anoxic-oxic.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:December 28,2015
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: July 11,2016
  • Published:
Article QR Code