Comparisons of in-situ stress fields and stability of faults in shallow and deep engineering areas
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines(University of Science and Technology Beijing), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China)

Clc Number:

P541

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to study the difference of tectonic stress field between shallow and deep engineering areas, the in-situ stress field characteristics and fault stability of shallow and deep rocks were analyzed and compared by regression analysis and fault friction slip criterion based on the measured in-situ stress data of 376 groups from shallow rocks and 619 groups from deep rocks after optimized processing. The results show that the stress field in deep rocks has a tendency to change from tectonic stress field to vertical stress field. The linear correlation between the principal stress and the depth in the deep rocks is higher than that in shallow rocks. With the increase of depth, the lateral pressure coefficients KH1, Kh1 of shallow rocks approaches 1.54, 0.85, respectively, while KH2, Kh2 of deep rocks are approached to 1.15, 0.85, respectively. The horizontal differential stresses (η1, η2) in shallow and deep rocks have the increasing trend with depth on the whole. The shallow and deep faults are mainly in stable state when the friction coefficient μ is 1.0, while the shallow thrust fault has large sliding possibility and the possibility of deep fault slip instability is smaller as μ is 0.6. When μ is weakened to 0.4 or as low as 0.2, the sliding possibility of shallow and deep faults increases significantly. In the slide stability criterion, μ may be selected as 0.6-1.0 or 0.4-0.6 for shallow or deep fracture and as about 0.6 or 0.4 for reverse or normal fault.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:August 24,2016
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: November 05,2017
  • Published:
Article QR Code