期刊检索

  • 2024年第32卷
  • 2023年第31卷
  • 2022年第30卷
  • 2021年第29卷
  • 2020年第28卷
  • 2019年第27卷
  • 2018年第26卷
  • 2017年第25卷
  • 2016年第24卷
  • 2015年第23卷
  • 2014年第22卷
  • 2013年第21卷
  • 2012年第20卷
  • 2011年第19卷
  • 2010年第18卷
  • 第1期
  • 第2期

主管单位 中华人民共和国
工业和信息化部
主办单位 中国材料研究学会
哈尔滨工业大学
主编 苑世剑 国际刊号ISSN 1005-0299 国内刊号CN 23-1345/TB

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
引用本文:曹增强,杨晓娜,左杨杰,仇继伟.钛合金干涉螺栓应力波安装质量模拟研究[J].材料科学与工艺,2018,26(1):24-30.DOI:10.11951/j.issn.1005-0299.20170157.
CAO Zengqiang,YANG Xiaona,ZUO Yangjie,QIU Jiwei.Installation quality assessment of interference fit titanium bolt in stress-wave driving process by simulations[J].Materials Science and Technology,2018,26(1):24-30.DOI:10.11951/j.issn.1005-0299.20170157.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1527次   下载 1100 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
钛合金干涉螺栓应力波安装质量模拟研究
曹增强, 杨晓娜,左杨杰,仇继伟
(现代设计与集成制造教育部重点实验室(西北工业大学),西安 710072)
摘要:
提高干涉螺栓安装质量是提高螺接接头连接效率的有效途径.为了提高钛合金干涉螺栓安装质量,建立钛合金干涉螺栓有限元动态安装模型,研究干涉量、摩擦因数和安装次数对接头安装质量的影响,并结合试验对安装模型进行验证.结果表明:应力波安装阻力小于强迫安装;1.0%干涉量下安装孔壁挤压不充分,2.0%干涉量时会引起孔壁划伤,1.5%干涉量下安装孔壁表面质量最优;1.0%和1.5%干涉量下安装阻力对摩擦因数不敏感,但干涉量增加到2.0%时,安装阻力和最大凸瘤高度随摩擦因数增大而显著增加;二次安装导致安装阻力和最大凸瘤高度大幅上升,安装孔壁形成明显层叠累积.综上所述,工程实践中推荐使用1.5%干涉量,以保证安装孔壁表面质量.为了提高经济效益,摩擦因数选择0.1~0.15,多次安装应避免使用.干涉量大于1.5%时,应通过多次铰孔、改善螺栓表面润滑效果等方法尽可能降低摩擦因数,进而有效减小安装阻力和最大凸瘤高度.
关键词:  电磁铆接  高锁螺栓  安装  干涉配合  安装质量  模拟
DOI:10.11951/j.issn.1005-0299.20170157
分类号:V261.7
文献标识码:A
基金项目:航空基金(2015ZE53065);陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目(2015KTCQ01-83).
Installation quality assessment of interference fit titanium bolt in stress-wave driving process by simulations
CAO Zengqiang,YANG Xiaona, ZUO Yangjie, QIU Jiwei
(Key Laboratory of Contemporary Design and Integrated Manufacturing(Northwestern Polytechnical University), Xi′an 710072, China)
Abstract:
Improving the installation quality is vital for the design optimization of interference-fit bolted joints. The installation quality of interference-fit titanium bolt using stress-wave driving method was assessed by numerical simulations and tests. The results showed that installation resistance using stress-wave driving method was smaller than that using forced driving method. Small plastic deformation was observed on the mounting hole with interference-fit size of 1.0%, while damage occurred with interference-fit size of 2.0%. Moreover, the best quality was achieved with interference-fit size of 1.5%. The installation resistance for interference-fit sizes of 1.0% and 1.5% showed little sensitivity to friction coefficients, while the installation resistance and peek protuberance height increased significantly with friction coefficient for interference size fit of 2.0%. The twice driving method results in the greater installation resistance, higher protuberance, and lower surface quality. It can be concluded that, the interference fit size of 1.5% is suggested in service to achieve an excellent surface quality of the installation hole after installation, and friction coefficients ranging 0.1~0.15 are also suggested to reduce installation cost without using twice driving method. When interference fit size is larger than 1.5%, the decrease in the friction coefficient is beneficial for the improvement in the installation quality by reducing the installation resistance and peek protuberance height.
Key words:  electromagnetic riveting  hi-lock bolt  installation  interference fit  installation quality  simulation

友情链接LINKS