| 引用本文: | 高梦鸿,高乃云,周金金,戎文磊,陆纳新,袁君.由混凝或气浮构成的组合工艺处理太湖原水比较[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2014,46(8):90.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2014.08.015 |
| GAO Menghong,GAO Naiyun,ZHOU Jinjin,RONG Wenlei,LU Naxin,YUAN Jun.Comparison of pilot effect between sedimentation and dissolved air flocculation for the treatment of Taihu Lake water[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2014,46(8):90.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2014.08.015 |
|
| 摘要: |
| 针对低温东太湖原水,考察常规+臭氧-生物活性炭(O3-BAC)处理中气浮和沉淀两种工艺对出水水质的影响．结果表明:气浮工艺对原水浊度的去除效果明显优于沉淀工艺,平均去除率高约10.1％,无论是气浮还是沉淀工艺,经O3-BAC深度处理后出水浊度均稳定在1 NTU以下;气浮工艺对有机物的去除效果略优于沉淀工艺,CODMn和DOC平均去除率分别高约5.4％和1.6％,常规处理工艺后出水有机物含量不能达标,O3-BAC工艺出水CODMn稳定在0.5～2.1 mg／L,DOC稳定在0.3～2.0 mg／L;沉淀／气浮工艺只对腐殖质略有去除效果,砂滤对荧光物质几乎无去除作用,而O3-BAC工艺是去除水中荧光类物质的主要手段;气浮工艺对藻类的去除效果略优于沉淀工艺,深度处理后出水硅藻活性和叶绿素浓度降为0,蓝藻仍保有部分活性． |
| 关键词: 太湖水 斜管沉淀 气浮工艺 O3-BAC 去除效果 |
| DOI：10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2014.08.015 |
| 分类号:TU991 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51178321);国家科技重大专项(2012ZX07403-001;2008ZX07421-002);高等学校博士点基金资助项目(20120072110050);住房和城乡建设部研究开发项目(2009-K7-4). |
|
| Comparison of pilot effect between sedimentation and dissolved air flocculation for the treatment of Taihu Lake water |
|
GAO Menghong1, GAO Naiyun1, ZHOU Jinjin1, RONG Wenlei2, LU Naxin2, YUAN Jun2
|
|
(1. Pollution Control and Resource Reuse State Key Laboratory, Tongji University, 200092 Shanghai, China; 2. Wuxi Water Works Co., Ltd, 214031 Wuxi, Jiangsu, China)
|
| Abstract: |
| The effluent quality of combined process containing O3-BAC treatment between sedimentation process and dissolved air flocculation(DAF) process for the treatment of East Taihu Lake raw water were compared. The results showed that the removal efficiency of turbidity by DAF was 10.1％ higher than that by sedimentation process, and the effluent turbidity was stabled at 1 NTU or less after the treatment of the O3-BAC. Compared with the sedimentation process, the CODMnand DOC removal efficiencies of DAF were increased by 5.4％ and 1.6％, respectively. The CODMnand DOC were stabled at 0.5-2.1 mg／L and 0.3-2.0 mg／L after O3-BAC process respectively, while the organic concentration could not reach to effluent standard after conventional treatment. O3-BAC process played a dominant role in the decrease of fluorescence intensity, while conventional treatment process had only a slight or no effect on the removal of fluorescent material. The experimental results indicated that the DAF was slightly better for algae removal efficiency than sedimentation process. The concentration of diatom activity and chlorophyll decreased to 0 and cyanobacteria still retained part of the activity after advanced treatment. |
| Key words: Taihu Lake water tube sedimentation process dissolved air flocculation process O3-BAC removal efficiency |
