期刊检索

  • 2024年第56卷
  • 2023年第55卷
  • 2022年第54卷
  • 2021年第53卷
  • 2020年第52卷
  • 2019年第51卷
  • 2018年第50卷
  • 2017年第49卷
  • 2016年第48卷
  • 2015年第47卷
  • 2014年第46卷
  • 2013年第45卷
  • 2012年第44卷
  • 2011年第43卷
  • 2010年第42卷
  • 第1期
  • 第2期

主管单位 中华人民共和国
工业和信息化部
主办单位 哈尔滨工业大学 主编 李隆球 国际刊号ISSN 0367-6234 国内刊号CN 23-1235/T

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
引用本文:沈培文,杨溥,洪基豪,杨熠明.不同柱脚连接的自复位钢梁框架抗震性能试验[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2020,52(8):30.DOI:10.11918/201909103
SHEN Peiwen,YANG Pu,HONG Jihao,YANG Yiming.Experiment on seismic behavior of self-centering steel beam frame with different column foot connections[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2020,52(8):30.DOI:10.11918/201909103
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1770次   下载 1195 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
不同柱脚连接的自复位钢梁框架抗震性能试验
沈培文1,杨溥1,2,洪基豪1,杨熠明1
(1.重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆400045;2.山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室(重庆大学),重庆400045)
摘要:
为研究不同柱脚连接形式对带自复位工字钢梁的单层单跨钢框架抗震性能的影响,设计制作了两个柱脚分别为固接和铰接的自复位框架试件,通过低周往复荷载试验,分析了试件的受力发展过程、承载力、滞回特性、延性、耗能能力及自复位能力.研究表明:柱脚固接的自复位钢框架,由于柱脚屈服后所需的恢复力远大于自复位工字钢梁提供的复位拉力,残余变形较大,结构自复位效果较差,因此不建议将其作为此类结构的柱脚连接形式;柱脚铰接的自复位钢框架在试验过程中的受力发展过程与理论分析结果吻合良好,仅耗能元件发生塑性变形,卸载后残余变形较小,具有“可恢复功能结构”的特点;柱脚铰接的自复位钢框架,在4%层间位移角时骨架曲线仍未出现下降段,承载力储备充足,试件的位移延性系数为3.1,等效黏滞阻尼系数为0.19,具有较好的抗震性能.
关键词:  自复位钢框架  固接柱脚  铰接柱脚  低周往复荷载试验  残余变形  抗震性能
DOI:10.11918/201909103
分类号:TU391
文献标识码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51578093);重庆市自然科学基金(cstc2018jcyjAX0061)
Experiment on seismic behavior of self-centering steel beam frame with different column foot connections
SHEN Peiwen1,YANG Pu1,2,HONG Jihao1,YANG Yiming1
(1.School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2.Key Lab of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area (Chongqing University), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China)
Abstract:
In order to study the influence of different column foot connections exerting on seismic behavior of single story and single span self-centering steel beam with I beam, two types of self-centering steel frame specimens composed of fixed column foot and articulated column foot respectively were designed and manufactured. The load transfer mechanism, bearing capacity, hysteretic behavior, ductility, energy dissipation capacity, and self-centering capacity of the specimens were analyzed by low cyclic loading test. Test results indicate that the self-centering frame with fixed column foot had larger residual deformation and poorer self-centering effect, since the required restoring force of the column foot after yielding was much greater than the force provided by the self-centering I beam. Therefore, it is not recommended to be adopted as column foot connection for such structures. The load transfer mechanism of the self-centering frame with articulated column foot agreed well with the theoretical analysis results. Only energy dissipation fuses had plastic deformation, and the residual deformation was small after unloading, indicating that it has the characteristic of “resilient structure”. When story drift was loaded to 4%, the skeleton curve had no descending section, and the self-centering frame with articulated column foot had adequate capacity reserve. The displacement ductility coefficient of the specimen was 3.1, and the equivalent viscous damping coefficient was 0.19, which shows that the structure has good seismic behavior.
Key words:  self-centering steel frame  fixed column foot  articulated column foot  low cyclic loading test  residual deformation  seismic behavior

友情链接LINKS