引用本文: | 杨娜,王民.“房桥合一”站厅结构振动舒适度烦恼率分析[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2017,49(6):130.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201504016 |
| YANG Na,WANG Min.Annoyance rate analysis of vibration comfort of “Building-Bridge Integration” station hall structure[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2017,49(6):130.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201504016 |
|
摘要: |
为研究“房桥合一”结构体系在多种动力荷载作用下高架站厅结构的舒适度与传统振动规范的适用性,对某大型客站进行人群、列车荷载下的动力测试,通过现场调查研究了该振动水平下的旅客烦恼反应;基于不同荷载类型与结构跨度,利用已有的考虑了模糊性与随机性的烦恼率模型进行反推计算,建立适合于评价“房桥合一”结构烦恼率的舒适度量化指标.研究结果表明:部分区域振动水平未达到人体感知阀值,实际烦恼率为2%;部分区域振动强度超过70 dB,其理论烦恼率为50%,然而实际烦恼率仍为2%,传统舒适度评价标准并不能准确评价该类新型结构体系.烦恼率模型可以量化任意振动强度下的干扰反应率,给出高架站厅结构的振动限值介于75~90 dB,与ISO规范振动反应描述较为一致,弥补了现行规范关于大跨度“房桥合一”结构舒适度评价的缺失.
|
关键词: 大跨度站厅 舒适度 烦恼率 容许振动限值 人群荷载 列车荷载 |
DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201504016 |
分类号:TU112.2+3 |
文献标识码:A |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金(51422801); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2012JBM007); 国家自然科学基金面上项目(51278049) |
|
Annoyance rate analysis of vibration comfort of “Building-Bridge Integration” station hall structure |
YANG Na1,WANG Min1,2,3
|
(1.School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2.Beijing’s Key Laboratory of Structural Wind Engineering and Urban Wind Environment(Beijing Jiaotong University), Beijing 100044, China; 3.Beijing Shougang landscape Co., Ltd., Beijing 100041, China)
|
Abstract: |
To study the comfort of "Building-Bridge Integration" station hall structure under various dynamic loads and the applicability of the existing vibration norms, a large passenger railway station was tested under pedestrian load and transit train load, meanwhile field investigation were implemented to study crowd disturbance response under the vibration level. This paper established comfort quantitative indicators, which is suitable to evaluate the annoyance rate of "Building-Bridge Integration" structure, based on different load styles and structure spans, used the existed annoyance rate model considering the fuzziness and randomness. Results indicate that partial region vibration level is under perception value, practical annoyance rate is 2%; partial region vibration intensity exceeds 70 dB, theory annoyance rate is 50%, but practical annoyance rate is 2%, traditional comfort evaluation standard can't accurately evaluate this structure type. Annoyance rate model can quantify annoyance rate under any vibration intensity, the vibration limit is between 75-90 dB, the result based on measured data is consistent with ISO standard in vibration response description, which make up deficiency of present comfort standard about long span"Building-Bridge Integration".
|
Key words: large-span station hall comfort annoyance rate tolerate limit of vibration pedestrian load vehicle load |