期刊检索

  • 2024年第56卷
  • 2023年第55卷
  • 2022年第54卷
  • 2021年第53卷
  • 2020年第52卷
  • 2019年第51卷
  • 2018年第50卷
  • 2017年第49卷
  • 2016年第48卷
  • 2015年第47卷
  • 2014年第46卷
  • 2013年第45卷
  • 2012年第44卷
  • 2011年第43卷
  • 2010年第42卷
  • 第1期
  • 第2期

主管单位 中华人民共和国
工业和信息化部
主办单位 哈尔滨工业大学 主编 李隆球 国际刊号ISSN 0367-6234 国内刊号CN 23-1235/T

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
引用本文:鞠萍华,黄广全,肖莉明,冉琰,姚梦生.多目标模糊综合评价的装配序列优选方法[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2018,50(7):154.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201706167
JU Pinghua,HUANG Guangquan,XIAO Liming,RAN Yan,YAO Mengsheng.Optimization method of assembly sequence based on multi-objective fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2018,50(7):154.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201706167
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1934次   下载 1607 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
多目标模糊综合评价的装配序列优选方法
鞠萍华,黄广全,肖莉明,冉琰,姚梦生
(机械传动国家重点实验室(重庆大学), 重庆 400044)
摘要:
为了对装配序列进行合理评价,确保装配序列优选结果的正确性,提出一种装配序列多目标模糊综合评价方法.通过调研及专家知识构建装配序列多目标评价指标体系,并定义各指标的量化方法;用模糊层次分析法评估各指标间的相对关系,以获取较准确的装配序列指标权重;根据评价指标的量化方法计算可行装配序列各指标的初始值,并结合指标相应权重使用消除和选择转换法综合评价不同装配序列的优势值和劣势值,根据优势值和劣势值排序结果,从正反两方面综合选择出最佳装配序列.以某企业机床传动系统X轴装配序列优选过程为例,验证了该方法的有效性.结果表明,可行装配序列综合评价结果合理,优选出的方案具有较好的精度和效率.装配序列多目标综合评价方法计算过程简单,实用性强且评价结果合理,可用于一般机械产品的装配序列设计过程.
关键词:  装配序列评价  可靠性  评价指标体系  模糊层次分析法  消除和选择转换法
DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201706167
分类号:TH165+.4
文献标识码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51575070);国家“高档数控机床与基础制造装备”科技重大专项(2015ZX04003-003;2016ZX04004-005)
Optimization method of assembly sequence based on multi-objective fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
JU Pinghua,HUANG Guangquan,XIAO Liming,RAN Yan,YAO Mengsheng
(State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions(Chongqing University), Chongqing 400044, China)
Abstract:
To evaluate the assembly sequence reasonably and ensure the validity of assembly sequence selection results, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for assembly sequence was proposed. Firstly, the multi-objective evaluation index system of assembly sequence was constructed by survey and expert knowledge, and the quantification methods of each evaluation index were defined. Then the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method was used to evaluate the relative relation among the indexes so as to obtain more accurate weight of each evaluation index of the assembly sequence. Finally, the initial value of each index of the feasible assembly sequence was calculated according to the quantization method of the evaluation index. Combining the relative weights of indexes, the advantages and disadvantages of the different assembly sequences were evaluated by means of elimination and choice translating reality, and according to the result of priority and inferiority, the best assembly sequence was selected. Taking an assembly sequence optimization process of X axis of a machine tool transmission system in an enterprise as an example, the feasibility of the proposed approach is illustrated. This result shows that the comprehensive evaluation result of feasible assembly sequence is reasonable, and the optimized scheme has better precision and efficiency. The multi-objective comprehensive evaluation method of assembly sequence is simple and practical, and the evaluation result is reasonable.
Key words:  Assembly sequence evaluation  Reliability  Evaluation index system  Fuzzy AHP  Elimination and choice translating reality

友情链接LINKS