期刊检索

  • 2024年第56卷
  • 2023年第55卷
  • 2022年第54卷
  • 2021年第53卷
  • 2020年第52卷
  • 2019年第51卷
  • 2018年第50卷
  • 2017年第49卷
  • 2016年第48卷
  • 2015年第47卷
  • 2014年第46卷
  • 2013年第45卷
  • 2012年第44卷
  • 2011年第43卷
  • 2010年第42卷
  • 第1期
  • 第2期

主管单位 中华人民共和国
工业和信息化部
主办单位 哈尔滨工业大学 主编 李隆球 国际刊号ISSN 0367-6234 国内刊号CN 23-1235/T

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
引用本文:刘小玲,汪炳,任远,黄侨.斜拉桥监测索力的时空评估方法[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2018,50(9):36.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201707114
LIU Xiaoling,WANG Bing,REN Yuan,HUANG Qiao.Temporal and spatial evaluation method of monitoring cable forces for cable-stayed bridge[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2018,50(9):36.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201707114
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2184次   下载 769 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
斜拉桥监测索力的时空评估方法
刘小玲1,汪炳2,任远3,黄侨3
(1.宁波大学 海运学院, 浙江 宁波 315211; 2.宁波大学 建筑工程与环境学院, 浙江 宁波 315211; 3.东南大学 交通学院, 南京 210096)
摘要:
为更准确地反映监测索力的综合状态,提出一种考虑索力时间和空间特征的评估方法.借鉴桥梁风险矩阵决策方法,将时间指标和空间指标置于一个矩阵中进行评估决策.时空评估等级分为四级,分别为蓝色Ⅰ级、黄色Ⅱ级、橙色Ⅲ级和红色Ⅳ级.时间指标同时考虑索力变化速率和变化幅度,其中,索力变化速率通过时间序列分析得到,变化幅度通过索力变化率绝对值计算得到.空间指标主要反映由偏载、单索损伤等因素造成的斜拉桥两侧索力的偏差程度,采用Canberra距离表征.以南京长江三桥7 a监测数据为例,对20根长索进行索力时间和空间的综合评估,得到群索评估表和评估等级分布图.结果表明:监测索力符合时间序列特性,可采用一元线性回归模型提取趋势项;斜拉索的时空评估等级在Ⅱ级及以上,主要原因有索力变化趋势过快和上下游索力差异较大.评估分布图为斜拉索的人工检查提供更有针对性的指导.
关键词:  斜拉桥  索力  时间序列  矩阵决策法  评估
DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201707114
分类号:U446.3
文献标识码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金 (6,1)
Temporal and spatial evaluation method of monitoring cable forces for cable-stayed bridge
LIU Xiaoling1,WANG Bing2,REN Yuan3,HUANG Qiao3
(1. Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China; 2. Faculty of Architectural, Civil Engineering and Environment, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China; 3. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)
Abstract:
To investigate the comprehensive state of cable forces, an evaluation method considering the temporal and spatial characteristics of the cable forces was proposed. Using the bridge risk matrix decision-making method, the time index and spatial index were taken into a matrix for evaluation and policy decision. The spatial and temporal evaluation levels are divided into four levels: blue grade Ⅰ, yellow grade Ⅱ, orange grade Ⅲ and red grade Ⅳ. Time index considers both the change rate and the amplitude of the cable forces, in which the change rate of cable force was obtained by time series analysis, and the amplitude of cable force was obtained by absolute value of change rate of cable force. Spatial index mainly reflects the deviation degree of cable forces on both sides of cable-stayed bridge caused by unbalance loading and single cable damage, and was characterized by Canberra distance. Taking 7 years of monitoring data from Nanjing No.3 Yangtze River Bridge as an example, twenty long stay cables were evaluated by the temporal and spatial comprehensive evaluation method. The group cables evaluation grade table and evaluation grade distribution map were formed. Results show that monitoring cable forces conform to time series characteristics, and a linear regression model can be used to extract trend terms. The temporal and spatial evaluation levels of the cables are grade Ⅱ and above, and the main reasons are excessively fast change rate of cable force and great differences between the upstream and downstream cable forces. The evaluation distribution map provides more targeted guidance for the manual inspection of stay cables.
Key words:  cable-stayed bridge  cable force  time series  matrix decision-making method  evaluation

友情链接LINKS