期刊检索

  • 2024年第56卷
  • 2023年第55卷
  • 2022年第54卷
  • 2021年第53卷
  • 2020年第52卷
  • 2019年第51卷
  • 2018年第50卷
  • 2017年第49卷
  • 2016年第48卷
  • 2015年第47卷
  • 2014年第46卷
  • 2013年第45卷
  • 2012年第44卷
  • 2011年第43卷
  • 2010年第42卷
  • 第1期
  • 第2期

主管单位 中华人民共和国
工业和信息化部
主办单位 哈尔滨工业大学 主编 李隆球 国际刊号ISSN 0367-6234 国内刊号CN 23-1235/T

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
引用本文:肖文彬,朱顺应,卢华,王红.流线搭接下的交叉口最优控制方案算法[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2019,51(3):165.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201712044
XIAO Wenbin,ZHU Shunying,LU Hua,WANG Hong.Algorithm for optimal intersection control scheme under movement lapping[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2019,51(3):165.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201712044
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1771次   下载 908 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
流线搭接下的交叉口最优控制方案算法
肖文彬,朱顺应,卢华,王红
(武汉理工大学 交通学院, 武汉 430063)
摘要:
为进一步提升信号交叉口控制方案的控制效率,提出一种考虑流线搭接的最优信号控制方案算法. 算法首先分析和细化流线相容关系,确定相位流线组合;然后将相位流线组合采用数组表示并随机抽样排列,根据信号控制方案相位流线的设置要求,充分考虑流线搭接,选取满足条件的相位组合方案作为交叉口可行相位组合方案;最后结合已有的配时模型,计算信号相位配时及车辆平均延误,通过对比车辆平均延误,选取最小延误对应的控制方案作为交叉口最优控制方案. 结果表明:算法所确定方案的车辆平均延误相比环栅结构相位组合方案减少0.3 s/pcu,分流式相位组合方案减少0.5 s/pcu,组合式相位组合方案减少4.5 s/pcu,由此说明此方法可行.
关键词:  交通工程  信控交叉口  最优信控方案  流线搭接  相容流线  相位流线组合
DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201712044
分类号:U491.114
文献标识码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金中国汽车产业创新发展联合基金重点项目(U1664262)
Algorithm for optimal intersection control scheme under movement lapping
XIAO Wenbin,ZHU Shunying,LU Hua,WANG Hong
(School of Transportation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)
Abstract:
To improve the control efficiency of the signalized intersection control scheme, the algorithm for optimal intersection signalization scheme was proposed by considering movement lapping. Firstly, the movement compatibility relation in intersections were analyzed and refined, and the phase movements’ combination was determined. Then, the phase movements’ combination was represented and the random samplings were re-arranged. According to the phase setting requirements of intersection signal control scheme, the feasible phase combination (FPC) schemes for intersections were obtained by selecting the phase combination schemes satisfying the condition and consideration of the movement lapping. Finally, the signal phase timing and average vehicle delay were calculated by combining the existing timing model, and the control scheme corresponding to the minimum average delay was selected as the optimal control scheme of the intersection by comparing the average vehicle delay. Analysis results showed that the average delay of movement vehicles under the proposed scheme was reduced by 0.3 s/pcu compared with the ring barrier controller structure phase combination scheme (RBS), 0.5 s/pcu compared with the diffluence phase combination scheme (DS), and 4.5 s/pcu compared with the combination phase combination scheme (CS). Therefore, it showed that the proposed method is feasible.
Key words:  traffic engineering  signalized intersection  optimal signalization scheme  movement lapping  compatible movements  phase movements combination

友情链接LINKS