期刊检索

  • 2024年第56卷
  • 2023年第55卷
  • 2022年第54卷
  • 2021年第53卷
  • 2020年第52卷
  • 2019年第51卷
  • 2018年第50卷
  • 2017年第49卷
  • 2016年第48卷
  • 2015年第47卷
  • 2014年第46卷
  • 2013年第45卷
  • 2012年第44卷
  • 2011年第43卷
  • 2010年第42卷
  • 第1期
  • 第2期

主管单位 中华人民共和国
工业和信息化部
主办单位 哈尔滨工业大学 主编 李隆球 国际刊号ISSN 0367-6234 国内刊号CN 23-1235/T

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
引用本文:张英,郭奇峰,蔡美峰,任奋华.硬岩脆性指标与弹性应变能关系初探[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2019,51(6):79.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201809127
ZHANG Ying,GUO Qifeng,CAI Meifeng,REN Fenhua.Preliminary study on relationship between brittleness index and elastic strain energy for hard rock[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2019,51(6):79.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201809127
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1449次   下载 852 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
硬岩脆性指标与弹性应变能关系初探
张英1,2,郭奇峰1,2,蔡美峰1,2,任奋华1,2
(1.北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083; 2.金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室(北京科技大学),北京 100083)
摘要:
为探讨硬岩脆性指标与弹性应变能之间的关系,采用侧向应变差法确定起裂应力,以岩石起裂应力和峰值强度为桥梁,基于断裂力学理论和能量理论解释了脆性指标与弹性应变能内在的联系,并从两种岩石单轴压缩试验中构建了脆性指标与弹性应变能之间的函数关系.结果表明:脆性指标B13、B14与起裂弹性应变能(单变量)符合幂函数关系,脆性指标B15、B16与起裂弹性应变能(单变量)符合幂函数或线性函数关系,脆性指标B13、B14、B15和B16与峰值弹性应变能(单变量)之间无明显函数关系;新定义的脆性指标可由起裂和峰值弹性应变能(双变量)获得,或由起裂弹性应变能(单变量)获得,脆性指标与峰值弹性应变能关系式的构建,对于研究岩爆倾向性具有重要意义;根据新定义的脆性指标,利用两种岩石算例验证表明,采用起裂弹性应变能的岩石脆性指标计算方法具有一定的可靠性.通过这一研究,为岩石脆性指标与起裂弹性应变能关系的确定提供了一种新方法.
关键词:  硬岩  脆性指标  弹性应变能  单轴压缩试验  函数关系
DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201809127
分类号:TU45
文献标识码:A
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0804101);国家自然科学基金(51774022)
Preliminary study on relationship between brittleness index and elastic strain energy for hard rock
ZHANG Ying1,2,GUO Qifeng1,2,CAI Meifeng1,2,REN Fenhua1,2
(1.School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2.Key Lab of High- Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines (University of Science and Technology Beijing), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract:
To study the relationship between brittleness index and elastic strain energy, the lateral strain response method was used to determine the crack initiation stress of hard rock. By using the crack initiation stress and peak stress of rock, the relationship between brittleness index and elastic strain energy was explained based on fracture mechanics theory and energy theory, and a functional relationships were constructed between brittleness index and elastic strain energy from uniaxial compression test for two types of rock. Results show that the brittleness indexes B13, B14are in power function relationship with the crack initiation elastic strain energy (single variable), and the brittleness indexes B15, B16are in power or linear function relationships with the crack initiation elastic strain energy (single variable). However, no apparent functional relationship was discovered between the brittleness indexes B13, B14, B15, B16and the peak elastic strain energy (single variable). The new brittleness index could be either obtained from both the crack initiation strain energy and the peak elastic strain energy (two variables), or the crack initiation elastic strain energy (single variable). The relationship between brittleness index and the peak elastic strain energy is of great significance for studying rock burst proneness. The calculation method for brittleness index was redefined. Besides, the verifications of two examples show that this method, using the crack initiation elastic strain energy, demonstrates certain credibility. This study provides a new method determining the relationship between brittleness index and the crack initiation elastic strain energy of rock.
Key words:  hard rock  brittleness index  elastic strain energy  uniaxial compression test  function relationship

友情链接LINKS