期刊检索

  • 2024年第56卷
  • 2023年第55卷
  • 2022年第54卷
  • 2021年第53卷
  • 2020年第52卷
  • 2019年第51卷
  • 2018年第50卷
  • 2017年第49卷
  • 2016年第48卷
  • 2015年第47卷
  • 2014年第46卷
  • 2013年第45卷
  • 2012年第44卷
  • 2011年第43卷
  • 2010年第42卷
  • 第1期
  • 第2期

主管单位 中华人民共和国
工业和信息化部
主办单位 哈尔滨工业大学 主编 李隆球 国际刊号ISSN 0367-6234 国内刊号CN 23-1235/T

期刊网站二维码
微信公众号二维码
引用本文:胡进军,田浩,谭景阳,刘巴黎,靳超越.海域和陆域地震动输入能量与强度指标相关性[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2023,55(9):7.DOI:10.11918/202201006
HU Jinjun,TIAN Hao,TAN Jingyang,LIU Bali,JIN Chaoyue.Correlation between input energy and intensity measures of offshore and onshore ground motions[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2023,55(9):7.DOI:10.11918/202201006
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1305次   下载 796 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
海域和陆域地震动输入能量与强度指标相关性
胡进军1,2,田浩1,2,谭景阳1,2,刘巴黎1,2,靳超越1,2
(1.中国地震局工程力学研究所,哈尔滨 150080;2.中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室(中国地震局工程力学研究所),哈尔滨 150080)
摘要:
为给概率地震危险性分析提供依据,研究了海域和陆域地震动弹性输入能量与其他地震动强度指标的相关性及海陆差异。基于日本K-NET台网的271次地震事件,包含1 784条海域地震动记录和4 480条陆域地震动记录,通过相关性分析选取了7个代表性强度指标。首先,计算了不同震中距下强度指标与绝对和相对输入能量的相关性,并从不同周期段及震中距的角度分析了结果;其次,对不同阻尼比下强度指标与绝对和相对输入能量进行相关性分析;最后,对比了海陆强度指标与输入能量的相关性差异。结果表明:在不同周期段,海域和陆域地震动与输入能量相关性最好的强度指标多数相同,但在不同震中距下,强度指标与输入能量相关系数的极值存在海陆差异;在不同阻尼比下,同一强度指标与输入能量的相关性存在海陆差异,初步分析发现该差异可能是海域地震动低频成分丰富造成的。因此在研究输入能量与强度指标相关性时,需考虑阻尼比、震中距的影响。相关结论可为海陆概率地震危险性分析相关研究提供参考。
关键词:  海域地震动  陆域地震动  输入能量  强度指标  阻尼比  相关性分析
DOI:10.11918/202201006
分类号:P315.9
文献标识码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(52078470, U1939210)
Correlation between input energy and intensity measures of offshore and onshore ground motions
HU Jinjun1,2,TIAN Hao1,2,TAN Jingyang1,2,LIU Bali1,2,JIN Chaoyue1,2
(1.Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China;2.Key Lab of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration), Harbin 150080, China)
Abstract:
To provide a basis for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, this paper investigates the correlation between elastic input energy and other intensity measures of ground motions and the difference between offshore and onshore ground motions. A total of 271 earthquake events were collected from the K-NET of Japan, and 1 784 offshore ground motion records and 4 480 onshore ground motion records were selected. Seven representative intensity measures were determined through correlation analysis. Firstly, the correlation between the selected intensity measures and absolute and relative input energy under different epicentral distances was calculated, and the results were analyzed from the perspectives of period and epicentral distance. Secondly, the correlation between intensity measures and absolute and relative input energy under different damping ratios was analyzed. Finally, the difference in the correlation between offshore and onshore intensity measures and input energy was compared. Results show that the intensity measures that have the best correlation with the input energy of offshore and onshore ground motions are mostly the same in different periods, but there are differences in the extreme values of the correlation coefficient between the intensity measures and the input energy for offshore and onshore ground motions under different epicentral distances. Under different damping ratios, the correlation between the same intensity measures and input energy are different between offshore and onshore ground motions. Through preliminarily analysis, it was found that the difference might be caused by the rich low-frequency components of offshore ground motion. Therefore, the influence of damping ratio and epicenter distance should be considered when studying the correlation between input energy and intensity measures. The results can provide reference for the related research of offshore and onshore probabilistic seismic hazard analysis engineering.
Key words:  offshore ground motion  onshore ground motion  input energy  intensity measure  damping ratio  correlation analysis

友情链接LINKS